← Back to search

Stress-induced omega phase transition in Nb thin films for superconducting qubits

Jaeyel Lee, Zuhawn Sung, Akshay A. Murthy, Anna Grassellino, Alex Romanenko

arXiv:2207.12495 · 2022-07-25

T2theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the observation of omega phase formation in Nb thin films deposited by high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) for superconducting qubits using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We hypothesize that this phase transformation to the omega phase with hexagonal structure from bcc phase as well as the formation of {111}<112> mechanical twins is induced by internal stress in the Nb thin films. In terms of lateral dimensions, the size of the omega phase of Nb range from 10 to 100 nm, which is comparable to the coherence length of Nb (~40 nm). In terms of overall volume fraction, ~1 vol.% of the Nb grains exhibit this omega phase. We also find that the omega phase in Nb is not observed in large grain Nb samples, suggesting that the phase transition can be suppressed through reducing the grain boundary density, which may serve as a source of strain and dislocations in this system. The current finding may indicate that the Nb thin film is prone to the omega phase transition due to the internal stress in the Nb thin film. We conclude by discussing effects of the omega phase on the superconducting properties of Nb thin films and discussing pathways to mitigate their formation.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9.3Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.3Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers