Simulation framework for microwave SQUID multiplexer optimization
Constantin Schuster, Mathias Wegner, Sebastian Kempf
arXiv:2208.02013 · DOI 10.1063/5.0135124 · 2022-08-03 · Journal of Applied Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
So far, performance prediction and optimization of microwave SQUID multiplexers has largely been based on simple approximate analytical models and experimental results. This is caused by the complexity of the underlying physics and the intricacy of operation and readout parameters. As a simplified description can never account for all potential effects occurring in a real device, we have developed a software framework to simulate the characteristics and performance of a microwave SQUID multiplexer. Our simulation framework is a powerful tool to guide understanding and optimization of microwave SQUID multiplexers and other related devices. It includes common readout schemes such as open-loop or flux ramp modulated readout as well as the nonlinear behavior of Josephson tunnel junctions. Moreover, it accounts for the non-zero response time of superconducting microwave resonators with high loaded quality factors as well as the most significant noise contributions such as amplifier noise, resonator noise as well as SQUID noise. This ultimately leads to a prediction of device performance that is significantly better as compared simple analytical methods. Using the simulation framework, we discuss first steps towards a full microwave SQUID multiplexer optimization and highlight some other applications which our simulation framework can be used for.
Similar papers
Design considerations for the optimization of λ-SQUIDs
similarity 0.89Constantin Schuster & Sebastian Kempf · 2023 · arXiv:2310.16529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superfluid stiffness of twisted multilayer graphene superconductors
similarity 0.89Abhishek Banerjee et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.13742
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of resonances on the noise performance of SQUID susceptometers
similarity 0.88Samantha I Davis et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.03836
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analytical model of the readout power and SQUID hysteresis parameter dependence of the resonator characteristics of microwave SQUID multiplexers
similarity 0.88Mathias Wegner et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.08278
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The scattering coefficients of superconducting microwave resonators: I. Transfer-matrix approach
similarity 0.88Qi-Ming Chen et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2109.07762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux coupled tunable superconducting resonator
similarity 0.88Juliang Li et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.12755
Source status unknown — claims are unverified