Quantized current steps due to the a.c. coherent quantum phase-slip effect
R. S. Shaikhaidarov, K. H. Kim, J. W. Dunstan, I. V. Antonov, S. Linzen, M. Ziegler, D. S. Golubev, V. N. Antonov, E. Il'ichev, O. V. Astafiev
arXiv:2208.05811 · DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04947-z · 2022-08-11 · Nature
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The AC Josephson effect predicted in 1962 and observed experimentally in 1963 as quantised voltage steps (the Shapiro steps) from photon assisted tunnelling of Cooper pairs is among the most fundamental phenomena of quantum mechanics and is vital for metrological quantum voltage standards. The physically dual effect, the AC coherent quantum phase slip (CQPS), photon assisted tunnelling of magnetic fluxes through a superconducting nanowire, is envisaged to reveal itself as quantised current steps. The basic physical significance of the AC CQPS is also complemented by practical importance in future current standards; a missing element for closing the Quantum Metrology Triangle. In 2012, the CQPS was demonstrated as superposition of magnetic flux quanta in superconducting nanowires. However the direct sharp current steps in superconductors; the only unavailable basic effect of superconductivity to date, was unattainable due to lack of appropriate materials and challenges in circuit engineering. Here we report the direct observation of the dual Shapiro steps in a superconducting nanowire. The sharp steps are clear up to 26 GHz frequency with current values 8.3 nA and limited by the present setup bandwidth. The current steps have been theoretically predicted in small Josephson junctions (JJs) 30 years ago. However, broadening unavoidable in JJs prevents their direct experimental observation. We solve this problem by placing a thin NbN nanowire in an inductive environment.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pairing dome from an emergent Feshbach resonance in a strongly repulsive bilayer model
similarity 0.91Hannah Lange et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.13040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Feasibility of the Josephson voltage and current standards on a single chip
similarity 0.90Rais S. Shaikhaidarov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.11018
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave Excitation of Atomic Scale Superconducting Bound States
similarity 0.90Janis Siebrecht et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.13098
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-Density-Wave-Induced Peak-Dip-Hump Structure and the Multiband Superconductivity in a Kagome Superconductor CsVSb
similarity 0.89Rui Lou et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.06497
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge Density Fluctuations with Enhanced Superconductivity at the Proposed Nematic Quantum Critical Point
similarity 0.89Youzhe Chen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.03956
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of a topological phase transition in a planar Josephson junction
similarity 0.89A. Banerjee et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.03453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified