Feasibility of the Josephson voltage and current standards on a single chip
Rais S. Shaikhaidarov, Ilya Antonov, Kyung Ho Kim, Artem Shesterikov, Sven Linzen Evgeni V. Il'ichev, Vladimir N. Antonov, Oleg V. Astafiev
arXiv:2410.11018 · DOI 10.1063/5.0221404 · 2024-10-14 · Applied Physics Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The quantum Josephson voltage standard is well established across the metrology community for many years. It relies on the synchronisation of the flux tunneling in the S/I/S Josepson junctions (JJ) with the microwave radiation (MW). The phenomenon is called the Shapiro steps. Together with the Quantum Hall resistance standard, the voltage standard forms the foundation of electrostatic metrology. The current is then defined as the ratio of the voltage and resistance. Realisation of the quantum current standard, would close the electrostatic metrological triangle of voltage-resistance-current. The current quantisation, the inverse Shapiro steps, was recently shown using the superconducting nanowires and small JJ. The effect is a synchronization of the MW with the Cooper pair tunnelling. This paves the way to combine the JJ voltage and current standards on the same chip and demonstrate feasibility of the multi-standard operation. We show the voltage and current quantization on the same chip up to frequency of 10 GHz, corresponding to the amplitudes 0.021 mV and 3.23 nA respectively. The accuracy of the voltage and current quantisation, however, is relatively low, 35 ppk and 100 ppk respectively. We discuss measures to optimise the JJs, circuit and environment to boost the amplitude and accuracy of the standards.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Quantized current steps due to the a.c. coherent quantum phase-slip effect
similarity 0.89R. S. Shaikhaidarov et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.05811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for non-unitary triplet-pairing superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric TaRuSi and comparison with isostructural TaReSi
similarity 0.89S. Sharma et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.09852
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge imbalance and Josephson effects in superconductor-normal metal mesoscopic structures
similarity 0.88A. F. Volkov · 2007 · arXiv:0709.4188
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Beyond the standard model of topological Josephson junctions: From crystalline anisotropy to finite-size and diode effects
similarity 0.88Barış Pekerten et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.05829
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higher-Order Nodal Hinge States in Doped Superconducting Topological Insulator
similarity 0.88Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.00682
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-Density-Wave-Induced Peak-Dip-Hump Structure and the Multiband Superconductivity in a Kagome Superconductor CsVSb
similarity 0.88Rui Lou et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.06497
Source status unknown — claims are unverified