Theory of Nb-Zr Alloy Superconductivity and First Experimental Demonstration for Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity Applications
Nathan S. Sitaraman, Zeming Sun, Ben Francis, Ajinkya C. Hire, Thomas Oseroff, Zhaslan Baraissov, Tomás A. Arias, Richard Hennig, Matthias U. Liepe, David A. Muller, Mark K. Transtrum
arXiv:2208.10678 · 2022-08-23
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Niobium-zirconium (Nb-Zr) alloy is an old superconductor that is a promising new candidate for superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavity applications. Using density-functional and Eliashberg theories, we show that addition of Zr to a Nb surface in small concentrations increases the critical temperature $T_c$ and improves other superconducting properties. Furthermore, we calculate $T_c$ for Nb-Zr alloys across a broad range of Zr concentrations, showing good agreement with the literature for disordered alloys as well as the potential for significantly higher $T_c$ in ordered alloys near 75%Nb/25%Zr composition. We provide experimental verification on Nb-Zr alloy samples and SRF sample test cavities prepared with either physical vapor or our novel electrochemical deposition recipes. These samples have the highest measured $T_c$ of any Nb-Zr superconductor to date and indicate a reduction in BCS resistance compared to the conventional Nb reference sample; they represent the first steps along a new pathway to greatly enhanced SRF performance. Finally, we use Ginzburg-Landau theory to show that the addition of Zr to a Nb surface increases the superheating field $B_{sh}$, a key figure of merit for SRF which determines the maximum accelerating gradient at which cavities can operate.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb0.95Zr0.05 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb0.90Zr0.10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 17.18 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb0.80Zr0.20 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21.17 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb0.75Zr0.25 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 22.02 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Orbital-selective time-domain signature of nematicity dynamics in the charge-density-wave phase of LaEuSrCuO
similarity 0.93Martin Bluschke et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.11528
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible Coexistence of Antiferromagnetic and Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in the Spin-triplet Superconductor UTe2 Revealed by 125Te NMR under Pressure
similarity 0.93Devi V. Ambika et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06893
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasi-two-dimensional Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in the Spin-triplet Superconductor Candidate CeRhAs
similarity 0.93Tong Chen et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.03566
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for non-unitary triplet-pairing superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric TaRuSi and comparison with isostructural TaReSi
similarity 0.91S. Sharma et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.09852
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higher-Order Nodal Hinge States in Doped Superconducting Topological Insulator
similarity 0.90Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.00682
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Layer buckling and absence of superconductivity in LaNiO2
similarity 0.90S. Rathnayaka et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.09826
Source status unknown — claims are unverified