Uniaxial strain, topological band singularities and pairing symmetry changes in superconductors
Macauley Curtis, Martin Gradhand, James Annett
arXiv:2209.00300 · 2022-09-01
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Uniaxial strain affects pairing symmetry states in superconductors by changing the lattice symmetry, and by altering Fermi surface topology. Here, we present a systematic study of these effects within a one-band negative-U Hubbard model for s, p and d-wave pairing states. We consider a general 2D model that can be applied to superconductors under uniaxial strain, modelled via hopping anisotropy, on a square lattice. The results presented here model an in plane compression along the x-axis, which reduces the lattice symmetry from a tetragonal to an orthorhombic crystal space group. The effects of hopping anisotropy on the different types of gap pairings are explored. We show that changes in Tc are tunable with hopping anisotropy and depend on the orientation of the gap function in relation to the opening of the Fermi surface during the Lifshitz transition. In comparing the model results to experimental data for the case of Sr2RuO4 it is found that both the d + id and d + ig pairings best describe the changes in Tc for the superconducting state in regards to its response to small uniaxial strain.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Why Scanning Tunneling Microscopy on SrRuO sometimes doesn't see the superconducting gap
similarity 0.91Adrian Valadkhani et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.13106
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation and strain effects in a chiral -wave superconductor
similarity 0.91Fischer, Mark H & Berg, Erez · 2016 · arXiv:1511.05177
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of strain inhomogeneity on a chiral p-wave superconductor
similarity 0.91Yue Yu & S. Raghu · 2019 · arXiv:1901.03668
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal state O NMR studies of SrRuO under uniaxial stress
similarity 0.90Yongkang Luo et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.01209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High- superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher in pressurized LaNiO
similarity 0.90Qiong Qin & Yi-feng Yang · 2023 · arXiv:2308.09044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Micron-scale measurements of low anisotropic strain response of local in SrRuO
similarity 0.90Christopher A. Watson et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.07197
Source status unknown — claims are unverified