← Back to search

Micron-scale measurements of low anisotropic strain response of local $T_c$ in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$

Christopher A. Watson, Alexandra S. Gibbs, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Clifford W. Hicks, Kathryn A. Moler

arXiv:1807.07197 · 2018-07-19

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Strontium ruthenate (Sr$_2$RuO$_4$) is a multiband superconductor that displays evidence of topological superconductivity, although a model of the order parameter that is consistent with all experiments remains elusive. We integrated a piezoelectric-based strain apparatus with a scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscope to map the diamagnetic response of single-crystal Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ as a function of temperature, uniaxial pressure, and position with micron-scale spatial resolution. We thereby obtained local measurements of the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ vs. anisotropic strain $ε$ with sufficient sensitivity for comparison to theoretical models that assume a uniform $p_x\pm ip_y$ order parameter. We found that $T_c$ varies with position and that the locally measured $T_c$ vs. $ε$ curves are quadratic ($T_c\proptoε^2$), as allowed by the C$_4$ symmetry of the crystal lattice. We did not observe the low-strain linear cusp ($T_c\propto \left| ε\right|$) that would be expected for a two-component order parameter such as $p_x\pm ip_y$. These results provide new input for models of the order parameter of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers