← Back to search

Nodeless superconductivity in the topological nodal-line semimetal CaSb2

Weiyin Duan, Jiawen Zhang, Rohit Kumar, Hang Su, Zhiyong Nie, Ye Chen, Chao Cao, Yu Song, Huiqiu Yuan

arXiv:2210.02028 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.214521 · 2022-10-05 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

CaSb2 is a topological nodal-line semimetal that becomes superconducting below 1.6 K, providing an ideal platform to investigate the interplay between topologically nontrivial electronic bands and superconductivity. In this work, we investigated the superconducting order parameter of CaSb2 by measuring its magnetic penetration depth change Δλ(T) down to 0.07 K, using a tunneling diode oscillator (TDO) based technique. Well inside the superconducting state, Δλ(T) shows an exponential activated behavior, and provides direct evidence for a nodeless superconducting gap. By analyzing the temperature dependence of the superfluid density and the electronic specific heat, we find both can be consistently described by a two-gap s-wave model, in line with the presence of multiple Fermi surfaces associated with distinct Sb sites in this compound. These results demonstrate fully-gapped superconductivity in CaSb2 and constrain the allowed pairing symmetry.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CaSb2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.6Pressure not reportedonset
CaSb2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.6Pressure not reportedunknown
CaSb2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.6Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers