$H$-$φ$ formulation in Sparselizard combined with domain decomposition methods for modeling superconducting tapes, stacks, and twisted wires
Nicolo Riva, Alexandre Halbach, Mika Lyly, Christian Messe, Janne Ruuskanen, Valtteri Lahtinen
arXiv:2212.03274 · DOI 10.1109/TASC.2023.3240389 · 2022-12-03 · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The growing interest in the modeling of superconductors has led to the development of effective numerical methods and software. One of the most utilized approaches for magnetoquasistatic simulations in applied superconductivity is the $H$ formulation. However, due to the large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) present when modeling large and complex systems (e.g. large coils for fusion applications, electrical machines, and medical applications) using the standard $H$ formulation on a desktop machine becomes infeasible. The $H$ formulation solves the Faraday's law formulated in terms of the magnetic field intensity $\mathbf{H}$ using edge elements in the whole modeling domain. For this reason, a very high resistivity is assumed for the non-conducting domains, leading to an ill-conditioned system matrix and therefore long computation times. In contrast, the $H$-$φ$ formulation uses the $H$ formulation in the conducting region, and the $φ$ formulation (magnetic scalar potential) in the surrounding non-conducting domains, drastically reducing DOFs and computation time. In this work, we use the $H$-$φ$ formulation in 2D for the magnetothermal (AC losses and quench) analysis of stacks of REBCO tapes. The same approach is extended to a 3D case for the AC loss analysis of a twisted superconducting wire. All the results obtained by simulations in Sparselizard are compared with results obtained with COMSOL. Our custom tool allows us to distribute the simulations over hundreds of CPUs using domain decomposition methods, considerably reducing the simulation times without compromising accuracy.
Similar papers
Modeling non-planar coils in a full-scale stellarator
similarity 0.90Merle Backmeyer et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.00945
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
3D Modeling of the Magnetization of Superconducting Rectangular-Based Bulks and Tape Stacks
similarity 0.88M. Kapolka et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.09548
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic modeling of levitation of a superconducting bulk by coupled -magnetic field and Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulations
similarity 0.88Francesco Grilli et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1807.00329
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling cross-field demagnetization of superconducting stacks and bulks for up to 100 tapes and 2 million cycles
similarity 0.88Anang Dadhich & Enric Pardo · 2020 · arXiv:2008.12006
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ac Losses in a Finite Z Stack Using an Anisotropic Homogeneous-Medium Approximation
similarity 0.88John R Clem et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0708.4024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Practical Forecasting of AC Losses in Multi-layer 2G-HTS Cold Dielectric Conductors
similarity 0.87M. Clegg & H. S. Ruiz · 2022 · arXiv:2210.11345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified