Electrical and thermal transport properties of kagome metals $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ ($A$ = Rb, Cs)
Xintong Chen, Xiangqi Liu, Wei Xia, Xinrun Mi, Luyao Zhong, Kunya Yang, Long Zhang, Yuhan Gan, Yan Liu, Guiwen Wang, Aifeng Wang, Yisheng Chai, Junying Shen, Xiaolong Yang, Yanfeng Guo, Mingquan He
arXiv:2303.03874 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.174510 · 2023-03-07
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report electrical and thermal transport properties of single crystalline kagome metals $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ ($A$ = Rb, Cs). Different from the structural similar kagome superconductors $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$, no charge density wave instabilities are found in $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$. At low temperatures below 5 K, signatures of superconductivity appear in $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ as seen in magnetization measurements. However, bulk superconductivity is not evidenced by specific heat results. Similar to $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$, $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ show nonlinear magnetic field dependence of the Hall effect below about 70 K, pointing to a multiband nature. Unlike $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ in which phonons and electron-phonon coupling play important roles in thermal transport, the thermal conductivity in $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ is dominated by electronic contributions. Moreover, our calculated electronic structure suggests that van Hove singularities are sitting well above the Fermi energy. Compared with $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$, the absence of charge orders in $A$Ti$_3$Bi$_5$ is closely associated with minor contributions from electron-phonon coupling and/or van Hove singularities.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CsTi3Bi5 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RbTi3Bi5 Archive — disputed claim Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| KV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RbV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CsBi2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.65 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RbBi2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.21 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
On the superconducting gap structure of the miassite Rh17S15: Nodal or nodeless?
similarity 0.98J. Y. Nie et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.08633
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-wave superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric WAlC superconductor: An NMR study
similarity 0.98D. Tay et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.02739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
FeGe1-xSbx:a series of novel kagome metals with noncollinear antiferromagnetism
similarity 0.98Jiale Huang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.16502
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of higher-order topological superconductors using Bott indices
similarity 0.98Xun-Jiang Luo et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.20334
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodeless superconductivity in the topological nodal-line semimetal CaSb2
similarity 0.97Weiyin Duan et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.02028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-temperature T resistivity in the underdoped pseudogap phase versus T-linear resistivity in the overdoped strange-metal phase of cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.97Xingyu Ma et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.16778
Source status unknown — claims are unverified