Superconductor-polariton non-dissipative drag in optical microcavity
Azat F. Aminov, Alexey A. Sokolik, Yurii E. Lozovik
arXiv:2304.10483 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.115415 · 2023-04-20 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider non-dissipative drag between Bose-condensed exciton polaritons in optical microcavity and embedded superconductors. This effect consists in induction of a non-dissipative electric current in the superconductor by motion of polariton Bose condensate due to electron-polariton interaction, or vice versa. Using many-body theory, we calculate the drag density, characterizing magnitude of this effect, with taking into account dynamical screening of the interaction. Hoping to diminish the interaction screening and microcavity photon absorption, we consider atomically-thin superconductors (both conventional s-wave and copper-oxide d-wave) of planar and nanoribbon shapes. Our estimates show that in realistic conditions the drag effect could be rather weak but observable in accurate experiments in the case of dipolar interlayer excitons in transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers. Use of spatially direct excitons, semiconductor quantum wells as the host for excitons, or thin films of bulk metallic superconductors considerably lowers the drag density.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb1-xTixN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductor-polariton nondissipative drag in optical microcavity
similarity 0.92Azat F. Aminov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagrams of the superconducting diode effect in topological hybrid structures
similarity 0.89T. Karabassov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.00549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-order phase transition between superconductivity and charge/spin-density wave as the reason of their coexistence in organic metals
similarity 0.89Seidali S. Seidov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.06957
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Peculiar effect of sample size in layered superconductors
similarity 0.88K. K. Kesharpu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2209.07085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pauli paramagnetism of triplet Cooper pairs in a nematic superconductor
similarity 0.88D. A. Khokhlov & R. S. Akzyanov · 2021 · arXiv:2109.05982
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lifshitz transition in dirty nematic superconductor
similarity 0.88R. S. Akzyanov · 2021 · arXiv:2107.03089
Source status unknown — claims are unverified