Coulomb interactions and conventional superconductivity: when going beyond the random phase approximation is essential

Camilla Pellegrini; Carl Kukkonen; Antonio Sanna

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064511

← Back to search

Coulomb interactions and conventional superconductivity: when going beyond the random phase approximation is essential

Camilla Pellegrini, Carl Kukkonen, Antonio Sanna

arXiv:2304.14682 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064511 · 2023-04-28 · Physical Review B

T1experimental11 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In ab initio calculations of superconducting properties, the Coulomb repulsion is accounted for at the GW level and is usually computed in RPA, which amounts to neglecting vertex corrections both at the polarizability level and in the self-energy. Although this approach is unjustified, the brute force inclusion of higher order corrections to the self-energy is computationally prohibitive. We propose to use a generalized GW self-energy, where vertex corrections are incorporated into W by employing the Kukkonen and Overhauser (KO) ansatz for the effective interaction between two electrons in the electron gas. By computing the KO interaction in the adiabatic local density approximation for a diverse set of conventional superconductors, and using it in the Eliashberg equations, we find that vertex corrections lead to a systematic decrease of the critical temperature (Tc), ranging from a few percent in bulk lead to more than 40% in compressed lithium. We propose a set of simple rules to identify those systems where large Tc corrections are to be expected and hence the use of the KO interaction is recommended. Our approach offers a rigorous extension of the RPA and GW methods for the prediction of superconducting properties at a negligible extra computational cost.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	1.03	Pressure not reported	unknown
In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	4.27	Pressure not reported	unknown
Li Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	7.82	22 GPa	unknown
Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	6.85	Pressure not reported	unknown
RbSi2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	10.1	Pressure not reported	unknown
Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	12.4	Pressure not reported	unknown
NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	11.6	Pressure not reported	unknown
MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	18.6	Pressure not reported	unknown
Nb3Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	20.7	Pressure not reported	unknown
SH3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	211.1	Pressure not reported	unknown