Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene-superconductor junctions
Panch Ram, Detlef Beckmann, Romain Danneau, Wolfgang Belzig
arXiv:2306.00529 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.184510 · 2023-06-01 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the Andreev and normal reflection processes -- retro as well as specular -- in a bilayer graphene-superconductor junction where equal and opposite displacement fields are applied for the top and bottom layers to induce a band gap. By employing the Dirac-Bogoliubov-de Gennes equation for the gapped bilayer graphene-superconductor junction, we calculate the reflections probabilities within the scattering theory approach. The subgap conductance, calculated in the framework of Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk formalism, shows the contribution from the Andreev retro-reflection (specular-reflection) when the applied bias voltage is below (above) the Fermi energy. Notably, both retro and specular reflections are modified in the presence of the displacement field, and the retro-to-specular crossover gets amplified when the displacement field is relatively small. They can be further tuned to either specular or retro Andreev reflection by adjusting the Fermi energy. Furthermore, our study reveals the simultaneous existence of double Andreev reflections and double normal reflections when the displacement field becomes comparable to the interlayer coupling strength. The existence of the normal retro-reflection process in a bilayer graphene-superconductor junction is a new finding which shows a distinctive feature in the conductance that can be experimentally verified.
Similar papers
Enhanced specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.91Abhiram Soori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.91Panch Ram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting Andreev processes in superconductor-graphene-superconductor (SGS) Josephson junctions: Comparison with experimental results
similarity 0.91Shahrukh Salim et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.10741
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetically modulated superconductor-graphene-superconductor (SGS) Josephson junctions and their tunability
similarity 0.91Partha Sarathi Banerjee et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.09925
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying Majorana vortex modes via non-local transport
similarity 0.90Björn Sbierski et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.11226
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection in altermagnets
similarity 0.90Sachchidanand Das & Abhiram Soori · 2024 · arXiv:2402.08263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified