Enhanced specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
Abhiram Soori, Manas Ranjan Sahu, Anindya Das, Subroto Mukerjee
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075301 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Andreev reflection in graphene is special since it can be of two types, retro or specular. Specular Andreev reflection (SAR) dominates when the position of the Fermi energy in graphene is comparable to or smaller than the superconducting gap. Bilayer graphene (BLG) is an ideal candidate to observe the crossover from retro to specular since the Fermi energy broadening near the Dirac point is much weaker compared to monolayer graphene. Recently, the observation of signatures of SAR in BLG have been reported experimentally by looking at the enhancement of conductance at finite bias near the Dirac point. However, the signatures were not very pronounced possibly due to the participation of normal quasiparticles at bias energies close to the superconducting gap. Here, we propose a scheme to observe the features of enhanced SAR even at zero bias at a normal metal (NM)–superconductor (SC) junction on BLG. Our scheme involves applying a Zeeman field to the NM side of the NM-SC junction on BLG (making the NM ferromagnetic), which energetically separates the Dirac points for up spin and down spin. We calculate the conductance as a function of chemical potential and bias within the superconducting gap and show that well-defined regions of specular- and retro-type Andreev reflection exist. We compare the results with and without superconductivity. We also investigate the possibility of the formation of a p-n junction at the interface between the NM and SC due to a work function mismatch.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Crossover from retro to specular Andreev reflections in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.99Dmitri K. Efetov & Konstantin B. Efetov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specular Andreev reflection in thin films of topological insulators
similarity 0.97Leyla Majidi & Reza Asgari
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoanisotropic spin-triplet Andreev reflection in ferromagnet-Ising superconductor junctions
similarity 0.95Peng Lv et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.94Abhiram Soori et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.00620
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.93Panch Ram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear optical responses in multiorbital topological superconductors
similarity 0.93Arpit Raj et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified