Enhanced Specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
Abhiram Soori, Manas Ranjan Sahu, Anindya Das, Subroto Mukerjee
arXiv:1801.00620 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075301 · 2018-01-02 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Andreev reflection in graphene is special since it can be of two types- retro or specular. Specular Andreev reflection (SAR) dominates when the position of the Fermi energy in graphene is comparable to or smaller than the superconducting gap. Bilayer graphene (BLG) is an ideal candidate to observe the crossover from retro to specular since the Fermi energy broadening near the Dirac point is much weaker compared to monolayer graphene. Recently, the observation of signatures of SAR in BLG have been reported experimentally by looking at the enhancement of conductance at finite bias near the Dirac point. However, the signatures were not very pronounced possibly due to the participation of normal quasi-particles at bias energies close to the superconducting gap. Here, we propose a scheme to observe the features of enhanced SAR even at zero bias at a normal metal (NM)-superconductor (SC) junction on BLG. Our scheme involves applying a Zeeman field to the NM side of the NM-SC junction on BLG (making the NM ferromagnetic), which energetically separates the Dirac points for up-spin and down-spin. We calculate the conductance as a function of chemical potential and bias within the superconducting gap and show that well-defined regions of specular- and retro-type Andreev reflection exist. We compare the results with and without superconductivity. We also investigate the possibility of the formation of a p-n junction at the interface between the NM and SC due to a work function mismatch.
Similar papers
Enhanced specular Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.92Abhiram Soori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-flip reflection at the normal metal-spin superconductor interface
similarity 0.92Peng Lv et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.06419
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specular Andreev Reflection in Graphene
similarity 0.91C. W. J. Beenakker
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specular Andreev reflection and its detection
similarity 0.90Qiang Cheng & Qing-Feng Sun · 2021 · arXiv:2104.11855
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in 2D relativistic materials with realistic tunneling transparency in normal-metal-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.90Yung-Yeh Chang et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1701.00591
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in bilayer graphene
similarity 0.89T. Ludwig
Source status unknown — claims are unverified