← Back to search

On the coupling of magnetic moments to superconducting quantum interference devices

J. Linek, M. Wyszynski, B. Müller, D. Korinski, M. V. Milošević, R. Kleiner, D. Koelle

arXiv:2307.05724 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ad1ae9 · 2023-07-11 · Superconductor Science and Technology

T3experimental1 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We investigate the coupling factor $φ_μ$ that quantifies the magnetic flux $Φ$ per magnetic moment $μ$ of a point-like magnetic dipole that couples to a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Representing the dipole by a current-carrying loop, the reciprocity of mutual inductances of SQUID and loop provides a way of calculating $φ_μ(\vec{r}, \vec{e}_μ)$ vs.~position $\vec{r}$ and orientation $\vec{e}_μ$ of the dipole anywhere in space from the magnetic field $B(\vec{r})$ produced by a supercurrent circulating in the SQUID loop. We use numerical simulations based on London and Ginzburg-Landau theory to calculate $φ_μ$ from the supercurrent density distributions in various SQUID geometries. We treat the far-field regime ($r\gtrsim a=$ inner size of the SQUID loop) with the dipole placed on the symmetry axis of circular or square shaped loops. We compare expressions for $φ_μ$ from filamentary loop models with simulation results for loops with finite width $w$ (outer size $A>a$), thickness $d$ and London penetration depth $λ_L$ and show that for thin ($d\ll a$) and narrow ($w < a$) loops the introduction of an effective loop size $a_{\rm eff}$ in the filamentary loop-model expressions results in agreement with simulations. For a dipole placed in the center of the loop, simulations provide an expression $φ_μ(a,A,d,λ_L)$ that covers a wide parameter range. In the near-field regime (dipole centered at small distance $z$ above one SQUID arm) only coupling to a single strip representing the SQUID arm has to be considered. Here, we compare simulations with an analytical expression derived for a homogeneous current density distribution, which yields excellent agreement for $λ_L>w,d$. Moreover, we analyze $φ_μ$ provided by the introduction of a constriction in the SQUID arm below the magnetic dipole.

Similar papers