Spatial resolution and point spread function of high-resolution scanning SQUID microscopy probes
Jan Ullmann, Katharina Kress, Timur Weber, Boris Gross, Daniel Jetter, Reinhold Kleiner, Martino Poggio, Dieter Koelle
arXiv:2607.17414 · 2026-07-19
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) show exceptional sensitivity to magnetic flux. In scanning SQUID microscopy (SSM), SQUID size and its distance to the sample are minimized in order to map weak magnetic fields with best possible spatial resolution. SQUID-on-lever (SOL) architectures have proven especially effective as SSM probes due to their small sensor size, robustness, and ease of integration with conventional atomic force microscopy hardware. In order to optimize magnetic microscopy carried out with SOL probes and to accurately reconstruct the magnetic fields that they measure, it is essential to know their point spread function (PSF). The size and shape of this PSF are determined by magnetic flux focusing effects, which depend on the characteristic length-scales of the superconductor and the sensor geometry. By simulating the coupling to sources of magnetic flux, this work provides a mathematical description of the SOL PSF, which contains a full description of the probe's magnetic sensitivity and spatial resolution. We then use measurements of a single magnetic skyrmion to measure the magnetic flux response of a real SOL. We demonstrate excellent agreement with flux responses that are obtained from simulations, thereby confirming the calculated PSF and spatial resolution.
Similar papers
Magnetic, Thermal, and Topographic Imaging with a Nanometer-Scale SQUID-On-Lever Scanning Probe
similarity 0.90M. Wyss et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-aligned nanoscale SQUID on a tip
similarity 0.90Amit Finkler et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.2921
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Lateral Josephson Junctions as Sensors for Magnetic Microscopy at Nano-Scale
similarity 0.90azmik A. Hovhannisyan et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2112.07172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Planar Superconductor-Ferromagnet-Superconductor Josephson junctions as scanning probe sensors
similarity 0.89T. Golod et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.05582
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning superconducting quantum interference device on a tip for magnetic imaging of nanoscale phenomena
similarity 0.89A. Finkler et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1206.2853
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced SQUID-on-lever scanning probe for high-sensitivity magnetic microscopy with sub-100-nm spatial resolution
similarity 0.89Timur Weber et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified