Preempted phonon-mediated superconductivity in the infinite-layer nickelates
Q. N. Meier, J. B. de Vaulx, F. Bernardini, A. S. Botana, X. Blase, V. Olevano, A. Cano
arXiv:2309.05486 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.184505 · 2023-09-11 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nickelate superconductors are outstanding materials with intriguing analogies with the cuprates. These analogies suggest that their superconducting mechanism may be unconventional, although this fundamental question is currently under debate. Here, we scrutinize the role played by electronic correlations in enhancing the electron-phonon coupling in the infinite-layer nickelates and the extent to which this may promote superconductivity. Specifically, we use $ab$ $initio$ many-body perturbation theory to perform state-of-the-art $GW$ and Eliashberg-theory calculations. We find that the electron-phonon coupling is effectively enhanced compared to density-functional-theory calculations. This enhancement may lead to low-$T_c$ superconductivity in the parent compounds already. However, it remains marginal in the sense that it cannot explain the record $T_c$s obtained with doping. This circumstance implies that conventional superconductivity is preempted by another pairing mechanism in the infinite-layer nickelates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.02 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.05 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.02 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.48 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.67 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.27 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.01 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.12 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ab initio study of orbital-selective superconductivity in -BiPd
similarity 0.94Sonu Prasad Keshri & Guang-Yu Guo · 2024 · arXiv:2411.14734
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations
similarity 0.93Ezra Day-Roberts et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.00223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phonon-mediated superconductivity in the Sb-square-net compound LaCuSb
similarity 0.93Kazuto Akiba & Tatsuo C. Kobayashi · 2023 · arXiv:2305.15619
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Pressure Dependent Interorbital and Interlayer Doping in Superconducting Nickelates
similarity 0.93Y. N. Huang & D. J. Singh · 2024 · arXiv:2407.16495
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlated electronic structure of a quintuple-layer nickelate
similarity 0.92Harrison LaBollita & Antia S. Botana · 2021 · arXiv:2111.14739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic Structure Trends Across the Rare-Earth Series in Superconducting Infinite Layer Nickelates
similarity 0.92Emily Been et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2002.12300
Source status unknown — claims are unverified