← Back to search

Nature of the magnetic coupling in infinite-layer nickelates versus cuprates

Armin Sahinovic, Benjamin Geisler, Rossitza Pentcheva

arXiv:2309.12840 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.114803 · 2023-09-22 · Physical Review Materials

T3experimental6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In contrast to the cuprates, where the proximity of antiferromagnetism (AFM) and superconductivity is well established, first indications for AFM interactions in superconducting infinite-layer nickelates were only recently obtained. Here, we explore, based on first-principles simulations, the nature of the magnetic coupling in NdNiO2 as a function of the on-site Coulomb and exchange interaction, varying the explicit hole doping and the treatment of the Nd $4f$ electrons. The $U$-$J$ phase diagrams for undoped nickelates and cuprates indicate $G$-type ordering, yet show different $U$ dependency. By either Sr hole doping or explicit treatment of the Nd $4f$ electrons, we find a transition to a Ni $C$-type AFM ground state. We trace the effect of Sr doping back to a distinct accommodation of the holes by the Ni versus Cu $e_g$ orbitals. The interaction between Nd $4f$ and Ni $3d$ states stabilizes $C$-type AFM order on both sublattices. Though spin-orbit interactions induce a band splitting near the Fermi energy, the bad-metal state is retained even under epitaxial strain. These results establish the distinct role of the magnetic interactions in the nickelates versus the cuprates and suggest the former as a unique platform to investigate the relation to unconventional superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NdNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
PrNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
LaNiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers