Nature of the magnetic coupling in infinite-layer nickelates versus cuprates
Armin Sahinovic, Benjamin Geisler, Rossitza Pentcheva
arXiv:2309.12840 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.114803 · 2023-09-22 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In contrast to the cuprates, where the proximity of antiferromagnetism (AFM) and superconductivity is well established, first indications for AFM interactions in superconducting infinite-layer nickelates were only recently obtained. Here, we explore, based on first-principles simulations, the nature of the magnetic coupling in NdNiO2 as a function of the on-site Coulomb and exchange interaction, varying the explicit hole doping and the treatment of the Nd $4f$ electrons. The $U$-$J$ phase diagrams for undoped nickelates and cuprates indicate $G$-type ordering, yet show different $U$ dependency. By either Sr hole doping or explicit treatment of the Nd $4f$ electrons, we find a transition to a Ni $C$-type AFM ground state. We trace the effect of Sr doping back to a distinct accommodation of the holes by the Ni versus Cu $e_g$ orbitals. The interaction between Nd $4f$ and Ni $3d$ states stabilizes $C$-type AFM order on both sublattices. Though spin-orbit interactions induce a band splitting near the Fermi energy, the bad-metal state is retained even under epitaxial strain. These results establish the distinct role of the magnetic interactions in the nickelates versus the cuprates and suggest the former as a unique platform to investigate the relation to unconventional superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Possible structural quantum criticality tuned by rare-earth ion substitution in infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.91Alaska Subedi · 2022 · arXiv:2203.11922
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiorbital processes rule the NdSrNiO normal state
similarity 0.91Frank Lechermann · 2020 · arXiv:2005.01166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Insulator-to-Metal Crossover near the Edge of the Superconducting Dome in NdSrNiO
similarity 0.91Yu-Te Hsu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2105.07783
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fundamental difference in the electronic reconstruction of infinite-layer vs. perovskite neodymium nickelate films on SrTiO(001)
similarity 0.91Benjamin Geisler & Rossitza Pentcheva · 2020 · arXiv:2001.03762
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Materials Design of Superconductivity in Nickelates
similarity 0.91Motoharu Kitatani et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.00239
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of Electrons on the Electronic Band Structure of Rare-Earth Nickelates
similarity 0.90Andrzej Ptok et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.03381
Source status unknown — claims are unverified