Wiring surface loss of a superconducting transmon qubit
Smirnov, Nikita S., Krivko, Elizaveta A., Solovieva, Anastasiya A., Ivanov, Anton I., Rodionov, Ilya A.
arXiv:2311.16794 · 2023-11-29
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum processors using superconducting qubits suffer from dielectric loss leading to noise and dissipation. Qubits are usually designed as large capacitor pads connected to a non-linear Josephson junction (or SQUID) by a superconducting thin metal wiring. Here, we report on finite-element simulation and experimental results confirming that more than 50% of surface loss in transmon qubits can originated from Josephson junctions wiring and can limit qubit relaxation time. Extracting dielectric loss tangents capacitor pads and wiring based on their participation ratios, we show dominant surface loss of wiring can occur for real qubits designs. Then, we simulate a qubit coupled to a bath of individual TLS defects and show that only a small fraction (~18%) of coupled defects is located within the wiring interfaces, however, their coupling strength is much higher due to stronger electromagnetic field. Finally, we fabricate six tunable floating transmon qubits and experimentally demonstrate up to 20% improvement in qubit quality factor by wiring design optimization.
Similar papers
Optimal Configurations for Normal-Metal Traps in Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.90A. Hosseinkhani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89Chen Wang et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.01854
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determining Interface Dielectric Losses in Superconducting Coplanar-Waveguide Resonators
similarity 0.89W. Woods et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Geometrical dependence of the low-frequency noise in superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.88T. Lanting et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Semiconductor-Nanowire-Based Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.88T. W. Larsen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fabrication of low-loss Josephson parametric devices
similarity 0.88K. E. Honasoge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified