1/f noise in quantum nanoscience
Giuseppe Falci, Pertti J. Hakonen, Elisabetta Paladino
arXiv:2401.11989 · DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-90800-9.00250-X · 2024-01-22
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Fundamental issues of 1/f noise in quantum nanoscience are reviewed starting from basic statistical noise processes. Fundamental noise models based on two-level systems (TLS) are described. We emphasize the importance of TLSs in materials parameter fluctuations, such as dielectric constant. The present understanding of 1/f noise in superconducting quantum interferometers and in single electron devices is summarized. For coherent quantum nanoscience, we introduce superconducting qubits and the relation between decoherence and 1/f noise using the filter function formulation. We also clarify the qubit noise spectroscopy and emphasize the importance of materials with reduced 1/f noise for future quantum coherent nanodevices.
Similar papers
Measuring Magnetic 1/f Noise in Superconducting Microstructures and the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem
similarity 0.90Matthew Herbst et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.15257
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Metamaterials
similarity 0.89N. Lazarides & G. P. Tsironis · 2017 · arXiv:1712.01323
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization of Metal-Induced Gap States at the Metal-Insulator Interface:Origin of Flux Noise in SQUIDs and Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.89SangKook Choi et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0907.3904
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlated flux noise and decoherence in two inductively coupled flux qubits
similarity 0.88Fumiki Yoshihara et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1007.1028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetism in SQUIDs at Millikelvin Temperatures
similarity 0.88S. Sendelbach et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0802.1518
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting qubits II: Decoherence
similarity 0.88Wilhelm, F. K. et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603637
Source status unknown — claims are unverified