← Back to search

Measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb: Distinguishing between surface pinning and an interface energy barrier

Md Asaduzzaman, Ryan M. L. McFadden, Edward Thoeng, Robert E. Laxdal, Tobias Junginger

arXiv:2402.15500 · DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/ad54f3 · 2024-02-23 · Superconductor Science and Technology

T1experimental4 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb samples using muon spin rotation ($μ$SR). Using thin Ag foils as energy moderators for the implanted muon spin-probes, we "profile" the vortex penetration field $μ_{0} H_{\mathrm{vp}}$ at sub-surface depths on the order of $\sim 10$ $\mathrmμ$m to $\sim 100$ $\mathrmμ$m. In a coated sample [Nb$_3$Sn(2 $\mathrmμ$m)/Nb], we find that $μ_{0} H_{\mathrm{vp}}$ is depth-independent with a value of 234.5(35) mT, consistent with Nb's metastable superheating field and suggestive of surface energy barrier for flux penetration. Conversely, in a surface-treated sample [Nb baked in vacuum at 120 $^{\circ}$C for 48 h], vortex penetration onsets close to pure Nb's lower critical field $μ_{0}H_\mathrm{c1} \approx 170$ mT, but increases with increasing implantation depth, consistent with flux-pinning localized at the surface. The implication of these results for technical applications of superconducting Nb, such as superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, is discussed.

Similar papers