Magnetic-field dependence of a Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier and integration into a high-field setup
L. M. Janssen, G. Butseraen, J. Krause, A. Coissard, L. Planat, N. Roch, G. Catelani, Yoichi Ando, C. Dickel
arXiv:2402.19398 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.054018 · 2024-02-29 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the effect of magnetic field on a photonic-crystal Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier (TWPA). We show that the observed change in photonic bandgap and plasma frequency of the TWPA can be modeled by considering the suppression of the critical current in the Josephson junctions (JJs) of the TWPA due to the Fraunhofer effect and closing of the superconducting gap. Accounting for the JJ geometry is crucial for understanding the field dependence. In one in-plane direction, the TWPA bandgap can be shifted by 2 GHz using up to 60 mT of field, without losing gain or bandwidth, showing that TWPAs without SQUIDs can be field tunable. In the other in-plane direction, the magnetic field is perpendicular to the larger side of the Josephson junctions, so the Fraunhofer effect has a smaller period. This larger side of the JJs is modulated to create the bandgap. The field interacts more strongly with the larger junctions, and as a result, the TWPA bandgap closes and reopens as the field increases, causing the TWPA to become severely compromised already at 2 mT. A slightly higher operating limit of 5 mT is found in out-of-plane field, for which the TWPA's response is hysteretic. These measurements reveal the requirements for magnetic shielding needed to use TWPAs in experiments where high fields at the sample are required; we show that with magnetic shields we can operate the TWPA while applying over 2 T to the sample.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Current-phase relation of a WTe2 Josephson junction
similarity 0.95Martin Endres et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.10273
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic penetration depth of Aluminum thin films
similarity 0.95David López-Núñez et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.14119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Stress Induced Source of Phonon Bursts and Quasiparticle Poisoning
similarity 0.95Robin Anthony-Petersen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2208.02790
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge-4 Superconductivity in a Hubbard model
similarity 0.95Martina O. Soldini et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.13348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic interaction between chiral currents and surface waves in topological superfluids: a pathway to detect Majorana fermions?
similarity 0.95S. Forstner et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.19469
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal correlations transmitted between quantum dots via short topological superconductor
similarity 0.95G. Górski et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.06630
Source status unknown — claims are unverified