Vortex motion in reconfigurable three-dimensional superconducting nanoarchitectures
Elina Zhakina, Luke Turnbull, Weijie Xu, Markus König, Paul Simon, Wilder Carrillo-Cabrera, Amalio Fernandez-Pacheco, Uri Vool, Dieter Suess, Claas Abert, Vladimir M. Fomin, Claire Donnelly
arXiv:2404.12151 · 2024-04-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
When materials are patterned in three dimensions, there exist opportunities to tailor and create functionalities associated with an increase in complexity, the breaking of symmetries, and the introduction of curvature and non-trivial topologies. For superconducting nanostructures, the extension to the third dimension may trigger the emergence of new physical phenomena, as well as advances in technologies. Here, we harness three-dimensional (3D) nanopatterning to fabricate and control the emergent properties of a 3D superconducting nanostructure. Not only are we able to demonstrate the existence and motion of superconducting vortices in 3D but, with simulations, we show that the confinement leads to a well-defined bending of the vortices within the volume of the structure. Moreover, we experimentally observe a strong geometrical anisotropy of the critical field, through which we achieve the reconfigurable coexistence of superconducting and normal states in our 3D superconducting architecture, and the local definition of weak links. In this way, we uncover an intermediate regime of nanosuperconductivity, where the vortex state is truly three-dimensional and can be designed and manipulated by geometrical confinement. This insight into the influence of 3D geometries on superconducting properties offers a route to local reconfigurable control for future computing devices, sensors, and quantum technologies.
Similar papers
Three-dimensional superconducting networks in a magnetic field
similarity 0.92Yasumasa Hasegawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortices on a superconducting nanoshell: Phase diagram and dynamics
similarity 0.91V. N. Gladilin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex control in superconducting Corbino geometry networks
similarity 0.91T. Okugawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Triplet Superconductivity in a Ferromagnetic Vortex
similarity 0.90Mikhail S. Kalenkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-induced giant vortex and asymmetric vortex confinement in microstructured superconductors
similarity 0.90X. H. Chao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex ratchet effect in superconductor open nanotubes and nanopetals
similarity 0.89Igor Bogush et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.20780
Source status unknown — claims are unverified