Shallow core levels, or how to determine the doping and $T_c$ of Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$ and Bi$_{2}$Sr$_2$CuO$_{6+δ}$ without cooling
Tonica Valla, Asish K. Kundu, Petar Pervan, Ivo Pletikosić, Ilya K. Drozdov, Zebin Wu, Genda D. Gu
arXiv:2405.18519 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224507 · 2024-05-28 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Determining the doping level in high-temperature cuprate superconductors is crucial for understanding the origin of superconductivity in these materials and for unlocking their full potential. However, accurately determining the doping level remains a significant challenge due to a complex interplay of factors and limitations in various measurement techniques. In particular, in Bi$_{2}$Sr$_2$CuO$_{6+δ}$ and Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$, where the mobile carriers are introduced by non-stoichiometric oxygen $δ$, the determination has been extremely problematic. Here, we study the doping dependence of the electronic structure of these materials in angle-resolved photoemission and find that both the doping level, $p$, and the superconducting transition temeprature, $T_c$ can be precisely determined from the binding energy of the Bi $5d$ core-levels. The measurements can be performed at room temperature, enabling the determination of $p$ and $T_c$ without cooling the samples. This should be very helpful for further studies of these materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Electronic structure and magnetic properties of LaNiO under pressure: active role of the Ni- orbitals
similarity 0.95Harrison LaBollita et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.17279
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Understanding Hydrogen Rich Superconductors: Importance of Effective Mass and Dirty Limit
similarity 0.94Andrew L. Cornelius et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2202.04254
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superradiant emission stimulated by vortex-antivortex pair production in layered superconductors
similarity 0.94Ahmad Sheikhzada & Alex Gurevich · 2024 · arXiv:2408.02610
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vector graphics extraction and analysis of electrical resistance data in Nature volume 586, pages 373-377 (2020)
similarity 0.94James J. Hamlin · 2022 · arXiv:2210.10766
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Creep-enhanced vortex pinning revealed through nonmonotonic relaxation of the Campbell length
similarity 0.94Sunil Ghimire et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.14891
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of controlling vortex matter via a superconducting Nanobridge
similarity 0.94C. A. Aguirre et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.15463
Source status unknown — claims are unverified