← Back to search

Shallow core levels, or how to determine the doping and $T_c$ of Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$ and Bi$_{2}$Sr$_2$CuO$_{6+δ}$ without cooling

Tonica Valla, Asish K. Kundu, Petar Pervan, Ivo Pletikosić, Ilya K. Drozdov, Zebin Wu, Genda D. Gu

arXiv:2405.18519 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224507 · 2024-05-28 · Physical Review B

T1experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Determining the doping level in high-temperature cuprate superconductors is crucial for understanding the origin of superconductivity in these materials and for unlocking their full potential. However, accurately determining the doping level remains a significant challenge due to a complex interplay of factors and limitations in various measurement techniques. In particular, in Bi$_{2}$Sr$_2$CuO$_{6+δ}$ and Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+δ}$, where the mobile carriers are introduced by non-stoichiometric oxygen $δ$, the determination has been extremely problematic. Here, we study the doping dependence of the electronic structure of these materials in angle-resolved photoemission and find that both the doping level, $p$, and the superconducting transition temeprature, $T_c$ can be precisely determined from the binding energy of the Bi $5d$ core-levels. The measurements can be performed at room temperature, enabling the determination of $p$ and $T_c$ without cooling the samples. This should be very helpful for further studies of these materials.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

91Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers