Comment on "Coexistence of superconductivity and topological aspects in beryllenes", Materials Today Physics 38, 101257 (2023)

Mikhail Petrov; Milorad V. Milosevic

← Back to search

Comment on "Coexistence of superconductivity and topological aspects in beryllenes", Materials Today Physics 38, 101257 (2023)

Mikhail Petrov, Milorad V. Milosevic

arXiv:2407.18254 · 2024-07-10

T2theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In a recent publication by Li $\textit{et al.}$, two phases of beryllene - $α$ and $β$ - were predicted to be single-gap superconductors with critical temperatures of 9.9 K and 12.6 K respectively. Moreover, the $α$-beryllene was shown to host type-I Dirac fermions with the existence of nontrivial edge states. We observe significantly weaker superconducting properties of both beryllene configurations. We argue that the superconducting gap evolution with temperature, as shown in Figure 5 (b and d) of Li $\textit{et al.}$, exhibits clearly unphysical trends with increasing temperature, leading to significantly overestimated values of the critical temperature and erroneous conclusions concerning the two-gap superconducting nature of $β$-beryllene. On a positive note, we report the value of the gap in the Dirac cone of the topological states of interest that exceeds the temperature range of superconductivity in $α$-beryllene, supporting the coexistence of topological features and superconductivity in this material.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

Formula	Reported Tc (K)	Pressure (GPa)	Type
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	9.9	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	12.6	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	3.8	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	8.5	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	4.35	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	2.78	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	2.18	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	6.15	Pressure not reported	unknown
Be Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.	6.09	Pressure not reported	unknown