← Back to search

Normal-state resistivity and the depairing current density of BaFe$_2$(As,P)$_2$ nanobridges along the $c$ axis

Yuki Mizukoshi, Kotaro Jimbo, Akiyoshi Park, Yue Sun, Tsuyoshi Tamegai, Haruhisa Kitano

arXiv:2408.09090 · 2024-08-17

T1theoretical

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report precise measurements to obtain the normal-state resistivity and the depairing current density of BaFe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$($x\sim0.29-0.32$) nanobridges along the $c$ axis, which are fabricated from single crystals near the optimal doping, by using focused ion beam (FIB) techniques. We obtained both of the $ab$-plane and $c$-axis resistivity ($ρ_{ab}$ and $ρ_c$) in the same part of a specimen, by fabricating the $c$-axis nanobridge in the middle of a narrow bridge extended in $ab$-plane, in spite of the slight deficiency of P dopant due to the additional FIB fabrication. The normal-state resistivity anisotropy agreed with the previous results for bulk samples, showing $ρ_c/ρ_{ab} < 8$ just above the superconducting transition temperature, $T_c$, in the slightly underdoped region and a slight decrease with increasing temperatures. The critical current density obtained in the $c$-axis nanobridges near the optimal doping reaches $\sim$8 MA/cm$^2$ at 0.15$T_c$, corresponding to about 87 % of a depairing limit derived by the Eilenberger equations. An extrapolation to $T=$0 K using the Ginzburg-Landau model suggests that the anisotropy of the depairing current density roughly corresponds to that of the normal-state resistivity. At low temperatures, we also observed a step-like voltage jump before arriving at the depairing limit, suggesting the occurrence of phase-slip phenomena near the depairing processes.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BaFe2(As0.676P0.324)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

27Pressure unresolvedzero_resistance
BaFe2(As0.676P0.324)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

27Pressure unresolvedonset
BaFe2(As0.683P0.317)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure unresolvedzero_resistance
BaFe2(As0.683P0.317)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure unresolvedonset
BaFe2(As0.713P0.287)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

16Pressure unresolvedzero_resistance
BaFe2(As0.713P0.287)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18Pressure unresolvedonset
BaFe2(As0.680P0.320)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

26Pressure unresolvedzero_resistance
BaFe2(As0.680P0.320)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

27.5Pressure unresolvedonset
BaFe2(As0.679P0.321)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure unresolvedzero_resistance
BaFe2(As0.679P0.321)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

28Pressure unresolvedonset

Similar papers