Normal-state resistivity and the depairing current density of BaFe$_2$(As,P)$_2$ nanobridges along the $c$ axis
Yuki Mizukoshi, Kotaro Jimbo, Akiyoshi Park, Yue Sun, Tsuyoshi Tamegai, Haruhisa Kitano
arXiv:2408.09090 · 2024-08-17
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report precise measurements to obtain the normal-state resistivity and the depairing current density of BaFe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$($x\sim0.29-0.32$) nanobridges along the $c$ axis, which are fabricated from single crystals near the optimal doping, by using focused ion beam (FIB) techniques. We obtained both of the $ab$-plane and $c$-axis resistivity ($ρ_{ab}$ and $ρ_c$) in the same part of a specimen, by fabricating the $c$-axis nanobridge in the middle of a narrow bridge extended in $ab$-plane, in spite of the slight deficiency of P dopant due to the additional FIB fabrication. The normal-state resistivity anisotropy agreed with the previous results for bulk samples, showing $ρ_c/ρ_{ab} < 8$ just above the superconducting transition temperature, $T_c$, in the slightly underdoped region and a slight decrease with increasing temperatures. The critical current density obtained in the $c$-axis nanobridges near the optimal doping reaches $\sim$8 MA/cm$^2$ at 0.15$T_c$, corresponding to about 87 % of a depairing limit derived by the Eilenberger equations. An extrapolation to $T=$0 K using the Ginzburg-Landau model suggests that the anisotropy of the depairing current density roughly corresponds to that of the normal-state resistivity. At low temperatures, we also observed a step-like voltage jump before arriving at the depairing limit, suggesting the occurrence of phase-slip phenomena near the depairing processes.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaFe2(As0.676P0.324)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| BaFe2(As0.676P0.324)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| BaFe2(As0.683P0.317)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| BaFe2(As0.683P0.317)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| BaFe2(As0.713P0.287)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| BaFe2(As0.713P0.287)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| BaFe2(As0.680P0.320)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| BaFe2(As0.680P0.320)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.5 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| BaFe2(As0.679P0.321)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| BaFe2(As0.679P0.321)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
Similar papers
Investigation of the Pauli paramagnetic effect in systematically tuned NbN thin films
similarity 0.93Xiaoni Wang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.05373
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structures and physical properties of V-based kagome metals CsVSb and CsVSb
similarity 0.93Qiangwei Yin et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2110.11452
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous sharp peak in the London penetration depth induced by the nodeless-to-nodal superconducting transition in BaFe(AsP)
similarity 0.91Huai-Xiang Huang et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.02382
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity of Light-Elements Doped HS
similarity 0.90Hongyi Guan et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.09437
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic penetration depth of Aluminum thin films
similarity 0.90David López-Núñez et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.14119
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Quadrupole Fluctuations and Collective Modes in Iron Pnictide Superconductors
similarity 0.89V. K. Thorsmølle et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1410.6456
Source status unknown — claims are unverified