Tunneling spectra of unconventional quasi-two-dimensional superconductors
L. Pisani, A. G. Moshe, P. Pieri, G. Calvanese Strinati, G. Deutscher
arXiv:2409.16804 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L100506 · 2024-09-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superfluid condensation can fundamentally be different from that predicted by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. In a broad class of low-carrier-density superconductors, such as granular aluminum, doped nitrides, and high-Tc cuprates, tunneling experiments reveal strong rather than weak coupling, as well as a conductance that does not return to that of the normal state upon approaching the critical temperature Tc. Here, we show that this behavior is in quantitative agreement with a tunneling theory that takes into account the large pairing-fluctuation effects that occur in the crossover region from weak-coupling BCS to strong-coupling Bose-Einstein condensation, provided the coherence energy scale rather than the single-particle energy gap is used to evaluate the coupling ratio. We also propose that the tendency toward strong coupling is a generic property of quasi-2D low-carrier-density superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.87Sr0.13CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.80Sr0.20CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 27.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Pseudogap in underdoped cuprates and spin-density-wave fluctuations
similarity 0.88Sedrakyan, Tigran A. & Chubukov, Andrey V. · 2010 · arXiv:1002.3824
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Test for BCS-BEC Crossover in the Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.88Qijin Chen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.08611
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magic gap ratio for optimally robust fermionic condensation and its implications for high-Tc superconductivity
similarity 0.88N. Harrison & M. K. Chan · 2021 · arXiv:2110.14785
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Shaping a superconducting dome: Enhanced Cooper-pairing versus suppressed phase coherence in coupled aluminum nanograins
similarity 0.88Uwe S. Pracht et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.04270
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the nature of the superconducting gap in the cuprates
similarity 0.88J. Quintanilla & B. L. Gyorffy · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mixed-symmetry superconductivity and the energy gap
similarity 0.87Pramodh Senarath Yapa et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.04739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified