Multi-orbital two-particle self-consistent approach -- strengths and limitations
Jonas B. Profe, Jiawei Yan, Karim Zantout, Philipp Werner, Roser Valentí
arXiv:2410.00962 · DOI 10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.1.026 · 2024-10-01 · SciPost Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Extending many-body numerical techniques which are powerful in the context of simple model calculations to the realm of realistic material simulations can be a challenging task. Realistic systems often involve multiple active orbitals, which increases the complexity and numerical cost because of the large local Hilbert space and the large number of interaction terms or sign-changing off-diagonal Green's functions. The two-particle self-consistent approach (TPSC) is one such many-body numerical technique, for which multi-orbital extensions have proven to be involved due to the substantially more complex structure of the local interaction tensor. In this paper we extend earlier multi-orbital generalizations of TPSC by setting up two different variants of a fully self-consistent theory for TPSC in multi-orbital systems. We first investigate the strengths and limitations of the approach analytically and then benchmark both variants against dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) and D-TRILEX results. We find that the exact behavior of the system can be faithfully reproduced in the weak-coupling regime, while at stronger couplings the performance of the two TPSC variants strongly depends on details of the system.
Similar papers
Electronic Correlations within Fermionic Lattice Models
similarity 0.88M. Matlak et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0711.0624
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Correlated Multi-Orbital Systems with Spin-Orbit Coupling: Coexistence of Even- and Odd-Frequency Pairing and the Case of Strontium Ruthenate
similarity 0.88Olivier Gingras et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.08918
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Luther-Emery liquid and dominant singlet superconductivity in the hole-doped Haldane spin-1 chain
similarity 0.88Pontus Laurell et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.13440
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermion-fermion interaction driven phase transitions in rhombohedral trilayer graphene
similarity 0.87Qiao-Chu Zhang & Jing Wang · 2024 · arXiv:2406.01877
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin fluctuations in superconductors with intersublattice and interorbital interactions
similarity 0.87Lauro B. Braz et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.02453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fabry-Perot superconducting diode
similarity 0.87Xian-Peng Zhang · 2024 · arXiv:2404.08962
Source status unknown — claims are unverified