Comment on "Square-well model for superconducting pair-potential"
Edouard Sonin
arXiv:2410.12580 · 2024-09-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The current-phase relation for a ballistic SNS junction in a 1D wire at T = 0 was derived by Thuneberg [1] neglecting phase gradients in superconducting leads. This invalidates the derivation, since the charge conservation law is violated. The theory of Ref. [1] predicts an unphysical phase jump in the limit of zero normal-layer thickness. In this limit the SNS junction becomes an ideal uniform superconductor, in which the currentis supported by a constant phase gradient without any phase jump.
Similar papers
Conductance spectroscopy of nontopological-topological superconductor junctions
similarity 0.84F. Setiawan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent detection of topologically trivial zero-energy states in nanowire junctions
similarity 0.84Oladunjoye A. Awoga et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.03783
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective Lagrangians for BCS superconductors at T=0
similarity 0.83Ian J. R. Aitchison et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range Josephson effect in mesoscopic T-shaped superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.83P. Samuelsson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dissipation-driven dynamical topological phase transitions in two-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.83Andrea Nava et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symplectic-N t−J model and s± superconductors
similarity 0.83Rebecca Flint & Piers Coleman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified