Hydride superconductivity: here to stay, or to lead astray and soon go away?
J. E. Hirsch
arXiv:2501.01466 · DOI 10.1007/s10948-025-06972-1 · 2024-12-31
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In a recent Comment (arXiv:2411.10522, Nat Rev Phys 7, 2 (2025)), fifteen prominent leaders in the field of condensed matter physics declare that hydride superconductivity is real and urge funding agencies to continue to support the field. I question the validity and constructiveness of their argument.
Similar papers
Hydride superconductivity: here to stay
similarity 0.89Gregory S. Boebinger et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.10522
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure”'
similarity 0.87J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Clear evidence against superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.86J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2021 · arXiv:2110.07568
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure
similarity 0.86J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Comment on `Nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure' "
similarity 0.85J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio · 2024 · arXiv:2405.08823
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the "Author Correction: Magnetic field screening in hydrogen-rich high-temperature superconductors", Nat Commun 14, 5322 (2023)
similarity 0.84J. E. Hirsch · 2024 · arXiv:2408.09073
Source status unknown — claims are unverified