Comparison of NiFeCr and NiFe in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions
Joshua Willard, Swapna Sindhu Mishra, Robert M. Klaes, Nicholas J. Emtage, Reza Loloee, Norman O. Birge
arXiv:2501.06845 · DOI 10.1063/5.0257749 · 2025-02-22 · Journal of Applied Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Josephson junctions containing ferromagnetic materials are under consideration for applications in digital superconducting logic and memory. Some memory applications rely on the ability to reverse the magnetization direction of a "soft" magnetic layer within the junction using a small local magnetic field generated on the chip. It is crucial, therefore, to find a suitable soft magnetic material with a low switching field and low switching energy. A popular magnetic material for such applications is Ni$_{80}$Fe$_{20}$, also known as Permalloy, however Permalloy has a rather large magnetization, leading to large magnetic switching energies. In this work we explore Cr-doped Permalloy, specifically Ni$_{73}$Fe$_{18}$Cr$_{9}$, which has a saturation magnetization just under two-thirds that of Permalloy. Josephson junctions containing this NiFeCr alloy undergo a 0-$π$ transition at a NiFeCr thickness of 2.3 nm, and the critical supercurrent decays in the alloy over a short characteristic length of 0.36 nm. Switching fields of a few millitesla are promising, but the short decay length and overall small values of the critical current in the Josephson junctions may preclude the use of NiFeCr in current cryogenic memory technologies.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Demonstration of 0-pi transition in Josephson junctions containing unbalanced synthetic antiferromagnets
similarity 0.89D. Korucu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.20922
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale spin ordering and spin screening effects in tunnel ferromagnetic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Roberta Satariano et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.09175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase dynamics and dissipation in tunnel ferromagnetic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89F. Calloni et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2605.18586
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of interfaces on supercurrent through ferromagnetic materials
similarity 0.89Swapna Sindhu Mishra et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.07151
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-triplet supercurrent in Josephson junctions containing a synthetic antiferromagnet with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy
similarity 0.88Joseph A. Glick et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.07247
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large critical current density Josephson junctions with PdNi barriers
similarity 0.88Arjun Sapkota et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2505.03913
Source status unknown — claims are unverified