Unified model of the Hall effect from insulator to overdoped compounds in cuprate superconductors
Júlia C. Anjos, Hércules S. Santana, E. V. L. de Mello
arXiv:2503.04955 · 2025-03-06
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Measurements of the Hall coefficient in La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$, ranging from the undoped ($x = p = 0$) Mott insulator to overdoped compounds, exhibit a temperature dependence that offers insights into their electronic structure. We interpret these results using a model based on the theory of phase-separation (PS) dynamics, which begins at half-filled ($n = 1$) and at a temperature $T_{\rm PS}(p)$, near the pseudogap temperature $T^*(p)$. The $n = 1$ holes have low mobility and provide the modulations of the charge density waves (CDW). As doping increases from $p = 0$, these modulations guide the additional p holes to occupy alternating CDW domains. This charge inhomogeneity may facilitate the formation of localized superconducting amplitudes below the critical onset temperature $T_{\rm c}^{\rm max}(p)$. Using thermal activation expressions, along with quantum tunnelling between the charge domains, we successfully reproduce all Hall coefficient measurements $R_{\rm H}(p,T)$ and highlight the relevant energies of cuprates. The calculations confirm three significant electronic features: the phase-separating role of the pseudogap temperature, the superconducting state achieved through phase coherence, and the two types of charge carriers whose energies and mobilities become comparable at $p \approx 0.19$, where $T^*(p) \approx T_{\rm c}^{\rm max}(p)$. This results in a crossover from $n = p$ to $n = 1 + p$. These findings, along with the $R_{\rm H}(p,T)$ calculations from insulating to overdoped compounds, underscore the critical role of the electronic phase separation in the properties of cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.99Sr0.01CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La1.99Sr0.01CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.95Sr0.05CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La1.95Sr0.05CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 70 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 225 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 34 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La1.88Sr0.12CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 190 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 150 | Pressure not reported | onset |
Similar papers
Unified model of the Hall effect from insulator to overdoped compounds in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.93Júlia C. Anjos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Disordered Induced Interaction and the Phase Diagram of Cuprates
similarity 0.91E. V. L. de Mello & Raphael B. Kasal · 2011 · arXiv:1112.2880
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Effects of Phase Separation in the Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.91E. V. L. de Mello & E. S. Caixeiro · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405612
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective three-band structure in Fe-based superconductors
similarity 0.91David Möckli & E. V. L. de Mello · 2014 · arXiv:1408.5884
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
From the spin-fermion model to anisotropic superconductivity
similarity 0.91Lizardo H. C. M. Nunes & Eduardo C. Marino · 2020 · arXiv:2010.13543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Common superconducting transition in under and overdoped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Hércules H. Santana and & E. V. L. de Mello · 2025 · arXiv:2507.01718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified