An Overview of Josephson Junctions Based QPUs
Omid Mohebi, Alireza Hesam Mohseni
arXiv:2504.02500 · 2026-07-16
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum processing units (QPUs) built on superconducting Josephson junctions remain the most industrially mature route to fault-tolerant quantum computing, but the field has moved substantially since early 2025. This paper provides an updated overview of Josephson-junction QPUs, grounded in the quantum-mechanical principles, superposition, entanglement, and decoherence, that any qubit implementation must contend with, and in the physics of Cooper pairing and quantum tunneling that make a Josephson junction behave as a controllable qubit. We examine the engineering challenges of scaling these devices, including crosstalk, classical control-interface bottlenecks, and quantum error correction, and discuss the first below-threshold surface-code demonstrations on superconducting hardware. We survey recent materials advances, near-term computational results, and applications beyond computing, and compare Josephson-junction QPUs against trapped-ion, photonic, and neutral-atom alternatives, the latter having emerged as a serious fourth architecture since our original analysis. We close with the current public roadmaps toward fault-tolerant superconducting quantum computers and a calibrated assessment of how much progress those roadmaps still require.
Similar papers
Superconductor bistable vortex memory for data storage and in-memory computing
similarity 0.91Mustafa Altay Karamuftuoglu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.08871
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Sensors Based on Long Josephson Tunnel Junctions - An Alternative to SQUIDs
similarity 0.91Roberto Monaco · 2012 · arXiv:1203.6091
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Realization and modeling of rf superconducting quantum interference device metamaterials
similarity 0.91M. Trepanier et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.1410
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
MicroSQUIDs based on V/Cu/V Josephson nanojunctions
similarity 0.91Alberto Ronzani et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.3863
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect in Superconductors and Superfluids
similarity 0.90Anna Posazhennikova · 2009 · arXiv:0908.1761
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Pseudogap by Josephson Tunneling
similarity 0.90Ivar Martin & Alexander Balatsky · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0002043
Source status unknown — claims are unverified