Magnetic Sensors Based on Long Josephson Tunnel Junctions - An Alternative to SQUIDs
Roberto Monaco
arXiv:1203.6091 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/25/11/115011 · 2012-03-27 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The properties of Josephson devices are strongly affected by geometrical effects. A loop-shaped superconducting electrode tightly couples a long Josephson tunnel junction with the surrounding electromagnetic field. Due to the fluxoid conservation, any change of the magnetic flux linked to the loop results in a variation of the shielding current circulating around the loop, which, in turn, affects the critical current of the Josephson junction. This method allows the realization of a novel family of robust superconducting devices (not based on the quantum interference) which can function as a general-purpose magnetic sensors. The best performance is accomplished without compromising the noise performance by employing an in-line-type junction few times longer than its Josephson penetration length. The linear (rather than periodic) response to magnetic flux changes over a wide range is just one of its several advantages compared to the most sensitive magnetic detectors currently available, namely the Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUID). We will also comment on the drawbacks of the proposed system and speculate on its noise properties.
Similar papers
An Overview of Josephson Junctions Based QPUs
similarity 0.91Omid Mohebi & Alireza Hesam Mohseni · 2026 · arXiv:2504.02500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nano-bridge Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices: beyond the Josephson limit
similarity 0.89Dibyendu Hazra · 2018 · arXiv:1809.09510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting flux-flow type ultra-low-noise magnetic sensors - An alternative to dc-SQUIDs
similarity 0.89Roberto Monaco et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.5761
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev spin-noise detector
similarity 0.89Roberto Capecelatro et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.01995
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junctions, superconducting circuits, and qubit for quantum technologies
similarity 0.88Roberta Citro et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.20911
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave Superconductivity
similarity 0.88Steven M. Anlage · 2020 · arXiv:2009.03839
Source status unknown — claims are unverified