The phase diagram of CeRh$_{2}$As$_{2}$ for out-of-plane magnetic field
P. Khanenko, J. F. Landaeta, S. Ruet, T. Lühmann, K. Semeniuk, M. Pelly, A. W. Rost, G. Chajewski, D. Kaczorowski, C. Geibel, S. Khim, E. Hassinger, M. Brando
arXiv:2504.15112 · DOI 10.1103/gt54-tvc2 · 2025-04-21 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The heavy-fermion superconductor CeRh$_{2}$As$_{2}$ ($T_{\textrm{c}} = 0.35\, \textrm{K}$) shows two superconducting (SC) phases, SC1 and SC2, when a magnetic field is applied parallel to the $c$ axis of the tetragonal unit cell. All experiments to date indicate that the change in SC order parameter detected at $μ_{\textrm{0}}H^{*} \approx 4\, \textrm{T}$ is due to strong Rashba spin-orbit coupling at the Ce sites caused by the locally non-centrosymmetric environments of the otherwise globally centrosymmetric crystalline structure. Another phase (phase I) exists in this material below $T_{\textrm{0}} = 0.54\, \textrm{K}$. In a previous specific heat study [K. Semeniuk et al. Phys. Rev. B, $107$, L220504 (2023)] we have shown that phase I persists up to a field $μ_{\textrm{0}}H_{0} \approx 6\, \textrm{T}$, larger than $H^{*}$. From thermodynamic arguments we expected the phase-I boundary line to cross phase SC2 at a tetracritical point. However, we could not find any signature of the phase-I line inside the SC2 phase and speculated that this was due to the fact that the $T_{0}(H)$ line is almost perpendicular to the $H$ axis and, therefore, invisible to $T$-dependent measurements. This would imply a weak competition between the two order parameters. Here, we report magnetic field dependent measurements of the magnetostriction and ac-susceptibility on high-quality single crystals. We see clear evidence of the singularity at $H_{0}$ inside the SC2 phase and confirm our previous prediction. Furthermore, we observe the transition across the $T^{*}(H)$ line in $T$-dependent specific heat measurements, which show that the $T^{*}(H)$ line is not perpendicular to the field axis, but has a positive slope. Our work supports recent $μ$SR results which suggest coexistence of phase I with superconductivity.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeRh2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeRh2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Field-angle dependence reveals odd-parity superconductivity in CeRhAs
similarity 0.88J. F. Landaeta et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.07975
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic properties and surface states of CeRhAs
similarity 0.87Konrad Jerzy Kapcia & Andrzej Ptok · 2023 · arXiv:2311.01037
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram of CeRhAs: Refinement of the parity-switch scenario
similarity 0.87Changhee Lee & P. M. R. Brydon · 2026 · arXiv:2607.04928
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Composite Superconducting Orders and Magnetism in CeRhAs
similarity 0.86Fabian Jakubczyk et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2506.08097
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Horizontal flux growth as an efficient preparation method of CeRhAs single crystals
similarity 0.86Grzegorz Chajewski et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.02372
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
AC susceptibility investigation of vortex dynamics in nearly-optimally doped REFeAsOF superconductors (RE = La, Ce, Sm)
similarity 0.86G. Prando et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1201.0044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified