Revisiting vestigial order in nematic superconductors: gauge-field mechanisms and model constraints
Ilaria Maccari, Egor Babaev, Johan Carlström
arXiv:2505.11630 · 2025-05-16
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An electronic nematic order that originates from superconducting fluctuation but persists above the superconducting transition temperature is often referred to as a vestigial nematic phase. Such a vestigial order belongs to the broader class of composite orders discussed in earlier literature, characterized by ordering in gauge-invariant combinations of superconducting order parameters while the individual superconducting order parameters remain disordered. These states include metallic superfluids, paired phases, and composite (charge-4e) superconductors. Whether and under what conditions such a vestigial phase can emerge in realistic models of nematic superconductors remains an open question. Recent analytical work [P. T. How and S. K. Yip, Phys. Rev. B 107, 104514 (2023)] concluded that vestigial nematic phases--and related mechanisms--do not appear in the widely studied models proposed for, e.g., Bi$_2$Se$_3$-based candidates. To shed light on this question, we perform large-scale Monte Carlo simulations of a three-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau model of a nematic superconductor. Consistent with the findings of How and Yip, our numerical results confirm that commonly considered models do not exhibit vestigial nematic phases or nematic-fluctuation-induced charge-4e superconductivity. Extending the analysis to include coupling to a gauge field, we show that vestigial nematic order can, under restrictive conditions, be stabilized through an alternative mechanism: intercomponent coupling mediated by the gauge field or the effects of strong correlations.
Similar papers
Absence of Ginzburg-Landau mechanism for vestigial order in the normal phase above a two-component superconductor
similarity 0.91P. T. How & S. K. Yip
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cascade of vestigial orders in two-component superconductors: Nematic, ferromagnetic, s-wave charge-4e, and d-wave charge-4e states
similarity 0.91Matthias Hecker et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting vestigial order in nematic superconductors: Gauge-field mechanisms and model constraints
similarity 0.91I. Maccari et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective model and Magnetic Properties of the Resistive Electron Quadrupling State
similarity 0.90Julien Garaud & Egor Babaev · 2021 · arXiv:2112.01286
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vestigial nematic order and superconductivity in the doped topological insulator CuBiSe
similarity 0.89Matthias Hecker & Jörg Schmalian · 2017 · arXiv:1712.07523
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-vestigial nematic order due to superconducting fluctuations in the doped topological insulator NbBiSe and CuBiSe
similarity 0.89Chang-woo Cho et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.01702
Source status unknown — claims are unverified