Exciton condensation from level repulsion: application to bilayer graphene
Harley D. Scammell, Oleg P. Sushkov
arXiv:2506.08402 · 2025-06-10
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Exciton condensation in semiconductors and semimetals has long been predicted but remains elusive. In a semiconductor, condensation occurs when the exciton binding energy matches the band gap. This binding energy results from a balance between Coulomb attraction, which enhances it, and kinetic energy, which suppresses it. However, reducing kinetic energy typically increases screening, weakening Coulomb attraction. Empirically, in most candidate materials, the binding energy remains below the band gap, with few external parameters capable of altering this balance. Here, we propose an in-plane electric field as a control parameter. This field induces hybridisation between even- and odd-parity excitons, and the resulting level repulsion effectively enhances binding energy. We argue that this mechanism is generic to excitons in semiconductors and illustrate it with a model of biased bilayer graphene. Bilayer graphene is chosen since it has a tunable band gap, making it an excitonic condensate candidate and moreover, the Zener tunnelling rate contains, in addition to the usual exponential decay, a non-standard oscillating component -- thanks to details of the electron dispersion. Analogous to quantum oscillations, we propose that Fourier spectrum of the current-voltage data allows for a novel test of exciton condensation. Finally, we show that the is a large excitonic gap to critical temperature ratio -- a clear prediction for STM studies.
Similar papers
Acoustic-phonon-mediated superconductivity in moiréless graphene multilayers
similarity 0.91Yang-Zhi Chou et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.09811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phonon-limited resistivity of multilayer graphene systems
similarity 0.89Seth M. Davis et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.04080
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic gap in the Hubbard model
similarity 0.88T. Baier et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0308591
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in monolayer and few-layer graphene: I. Review of possible pairing symmetries and basic electronic properties
similarity 0.88Emile Pangburn et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.05146
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exciton condensation in biased bilayer graphene
similarity 0.88Harley D. Scammell & Oleg P. Sushkov · 2023 · arXiv:2301.07864
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical screening and excitonic bound states in biased bilayer graphene
similarity 0.88Harley D. Scammell & Oleg P. Sushkov · 2022 · arXiv:2207.03260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified