High-$T_{\rm c}$ Ag$_x$BC and Cu$_x$BC superconductors accessible via topochemical reactions
Daviti Gochitashvili, Charlsey R. Tomassetti, Elena R. Margine, Aleksey N. Kolmogorov
arXiv:2507.14281 · 2025-07-18
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Hole-doping of covalent materials has long served as a blueprint for designing conventional high-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductors, but thermodynamic constraints severely limit the space of realizable compounds. Our ab initio results indicate that metastable Ag$_x$BC and Cu$_x$BC phases can be accessed via standard topochemical ion exchange reactions starting from Li$_x$BC precursors. Unlike all known stoichiometric layered metal borocarbides, the predicted AgBC and CuBC derivatives, comprising honeycomb layers bridged by dumbbells, are metallic rather than semiconducting. Anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg analysis reveals that the intrinsically hole-doped AgBC possesses a unique combination of electronic and vibrational features to exhibit two-gap superconductivity above 50 K.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CuBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu2/3BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu2/3BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu5/8BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 23.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Cu5/8BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| AgBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| AgBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| AgBC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 56 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ag1/2BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ag1/2BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/6Cu2/3BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/6Cu2/3BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/2Cu1/6BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/2Cu1/6BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/2Ag1/4BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10.9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/2Ag1/4BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/4Ag1/2BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li1/4Ag1/2BC Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 18.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
First-principles design of ambient-pressure MgxB2C2 and NaxBC superconductors
similarity 0.91Charlsey R. Tomassetti et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of High Tc Superconductivity in Hole-Doped LiBC
similarity 0.90H. Rosner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conventional high-temperature superconductivity in σ-band driven metallized two-dimensional metal borocarbides
similarity 0.89Yiming Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-principles prediction of superconductivity in MgBC
similarity 0.89Truong-Tho Pham & Duc-Long Nguyen · 2022 · arXiv:2212.14184
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizing MgB2-like superconductivity in LiB2C2-derived borocarbides through isovalent metal cosubstitution
similarity 0.88Renhai Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Tc in transition-metal-embedded B2C2 and B2P2 monolayers: A route to tunable two-dimensional superconductors via atomic and stacking design
similarity 0.87Zheng-Wei Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified