Low barrier ZrO$_x$-based Josephson junctions
Jaehong Choi, Maciej Olszewski, Luojia Zhang, Zhaslan Baraissov, Tathagata Banerjee, Kushagra Aggarwal, Sarvesh Chaudhari, Tomás A. Arias, David A. Muller, Valla Fatemi, Gregory D. Fuchs
arXiv:2508.11593 · DOI 10.1063/5.0296881 · 2025-08-15 · APL Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Josephson junction is a crucial element in superconducting devices, and niobium is a promising candidate for the superconducting material due to its large energy gap relative to aluminum. AlO$_x$ has long been regarded as the highest quality oxide tunnel barrier and is often used in niobium-based junctions. Here we propose ZrO$_x$ as an alternative tunnel barrier material for Nb electrodes. We theoretically estimate that zirconium oxide has excellent oxygen retention properties and experimentally verify that there is no significant oxygen diffusion leading to NbO$_x$ formation in the adjacent Nb electrode. We develop a top-down, subtractive fabrication process for Nb/Zr-ZrO$_x$/Nb Josephson junctions, which enables scalability and large-scale production of superconducting electronics. Using cross sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy, we experimentally find that depending on the Zr thickness, ZrO$_x$ tunnel barriers can be fully crystalline with chemically abrupt interfaces with niobium. Further analysis using electron energy loss spectroscopy reveals that ZrO$_x$ corresponds to tetragonal ZrO$_2$. Room temperature characterization of fabricated junctions using Simmons' model shows that ZrO$_2$ exhibits a low tunnel barrier height, which is promising in merged-element transmon applications. Low temperature transport measurements reveal sub-gap structure, while the low-voltage sub-gap resistance remains in the megaohm range.
Similar papers
Substrate insulated Josephson junctions for superconducting quantum circuits
similarity 0.90U. Strobel et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.12262
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Titanium Nitride Film on Sapphire Substrate with Low Dielectric Loss for Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.89Hao Deng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.03528
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.88Edward Leonard et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.07930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microwave quantum diode
similarity 0.88Rishabh Upadhyay et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.00799
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stacked Josephson junctions for quantum circuit applications
similarity 0.88Alex Kreuzer et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2503.11437
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Coupling and Fiske Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions
similarity 0.88G. Wild et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.3341
Source status unknown — claims are unverified