Dichotomy in Low- and High-energy Band Renormalizations in Trilayer Nickelate $La_{4}Ni_{3}O_{10}$: a Comparison with Cuprates
X. Du, Y. L. Wang, Y. D. Li, Y. T. Cao, M. X. Zhang, C. Y. Pei, J. M. Yang, W. X. Zhao, K. Y. Zhai, Z. K. Liu, Z. W. Li, J. K. Zhao, Z. T. Liu, D. W. Shen, Z. Li, Y. He, Y. L. Chen, Y. P. Qi, H. J. Guo, L. X. Yang
arXiv:2509.08974 · DOI 10.1103/smkf-k7wq · 2025-09-10 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Band renormalizations comprise crucial insights for understanding the intricate roles of electron-boson coupling and electron correlation in emergent phenomena such as superconductivity. In this study, by combining high-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and theoretical calculations, we systematically investigate the electronic structure of the trilayer nickelate superconductor $La_{4}Ni_{3}O_{10}$ at ambient pressure. We reveal a dichotomy in the electronic band renormalizations of $La_{4}Ni_{3}O_{10}$ in comparison to cuprate superconductors. At a high energy scale of hundreds of meV, its band structure is strongly renormalized by electron correlation effect enhanced by Hund coupling. The resultant waterfall-like dispersions resemble the high-energy kinks in cuprate superconductors. However, at low energy scales of tens of meV, the dispersive bands are nearly featureless and devoid of any resolvable electron-boson interactions, in drastic contrast to the low-energy kinks observed in cuprates and other correlated 3d transition-metal compounds. The dichotomic band renormalizations highlight the disparity between nickelate and cuprate superconductors and emphasize the importance of strong electron-correlation in the superconductivity of Ruddlesden-Popper phase nickelates.
Similar papers
Comparative Raman study of Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates and the monolayer-trilayer polymorph
similarity 0.88Vignesh Sundaramurthy et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.17583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-density wave and superconductivity in LaNiO under ambient pressure
similarity 0.88Ming Zhang et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2411.12349
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure and doping effects on the electronic structure and magnetism of the single-layer nickelate LaNiO
similarity 0.88J. B. de Vaulx et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2506.23823
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in a trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate LaNiO under pressure and its experimental examination: comparison with LaNiO
similarity 0.87Hirofumi Sakakibara et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.09462
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic band renormalization and nodeless gap of LiTi2O4 spinel superconductor
similarity 0.87Min-Yi-Nan Lei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure and doping effects on the electronic structure and magnetism of the single-layer nickelate La2NiO4
similarity 0.86J. B. de Vaulx et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified