Reinforcement learning-guided optimization of critical current in high-temperature superconductors
Mouyang Cheng, Qiwei Wan, Bowen Yu, Eunbi Rha, Michael J Landry, Mingda Li
arXiv:2510.22424 · DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2510.22424 · 2025-10-25 · ArXiv
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
High-temperature superconductors are essential for next-generation energy and quantum technologies, yet their performance is often limited by the critical current density ($J_c$), which is strongly influenced by microstructural defects. Optimizing $J_c$ through defect engineering is challenging due to the complex interplay of defect type, density, and spatial correlation. Here we present an integrated workflow that combines reinforcement learning (RL) with time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) simulations to autonomously identify optimal defect configurations that maximize $J_c$. In our framework, TDGL simulations generate current-voltage characteristics to evaluate $J_c$, which serves as the reward signal that guides the RL agent to iteratively refine defect configurations. We find that the agent discovers optimal defect densities and correlations in two-dimensional thin-film geometries, enhancing vortex pinning and $J_c$ relative to the pristine thin-film, approaching 60\% of theoretical depairing limit with up to 15-fold enhancement compared to random initialization. This RL-driven approach provides a scalable strategy for defect engineering, with broad implications for advancing HTS applications in fusion magnets, particle accelerators, and other high-field technologies.
Similar papers
Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature
similarity 0.89Valentin Stanev et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards the discovery of high critical magnetic field superconductors
similarity 0.89Benjamin Geisler et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2601.21044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Toward superconducting critical current by design
similarity 0.89I. A. Sadovskyy et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.06446
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Functional Form of the Superconducting Critical Temperature from Machine Learning
similarity 0.87S. R. Xie et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.06780
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Large Language Models for Superconductor Discovery
similarity 0.87Suman Itani et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2512.10847
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling behavior of superconductors
similarity 0.87V. R. Shaginyan et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.15068
Source status unknown — claims are unverified