Beyond Random Phase Approximation in electron-hole bilayer superfluidity
Filippo Pascucci, Stefania De Palo, Sara Conti, David Neilson, Andrea Perali, Gaetano Senatore
arXiv:2510.23743 · 2025-10-27
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We derive the normal and anomalous proper polarization functions and the screened Coulomb interactions in a two-dimensional superfluid electron-hole bilayer, including all first-order corrections beyond the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). This requires a modification of the perturbation method as first noted by Nozières and Schrieffer [1, 2]. We discuss the physical origin and magnitude of the first-order corrections in a superfluid system with long-range Coulomb interactions. Unlike conventional superconductivity, Migdal's theorem does not apply here, so exchange vertex corrections cannot be neglected. The screened electron-electron, hole-hole, and electron-hole interactions in the superfluid state are evaluated as functions of the carrier density. We find that at low density, the strong cancellations between the normal and anomalous components that make screening of the interactions negligible, apply not only within RPA but also with the first-order corrections included. As the density is increased, the normal-anomalous cancellation weakens and screening becomes increasingly significant. We find that the first-order corrections amplify the normal-anomalous difference but only at large momenta exchanged in the two-particle scattering, so their effect on the interactions remains modest. We conclude that the superfluid state RPA is an excellent approximation for the screening and for the effective electron-hole pairing in this superfluid system over the range of densities up to the maximum of the superfluid gap.
Similar papers
Coulomb interactions and conventional superconductivity: when going beyond the random phase approximation is essential
similarity 0.90Camilla Pellegrini et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.14682
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution from an acoustic-plasmon-mediated superconductivity to an acoustic-phonon-mediated superconductivity in bilayers
similarity 0.89Shuyang Wang et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.10835
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Upper bounds on superconducting and excitonic phase-stiffness for interacting isolated narrow bands
similarity 0.89Dan Mao & Debanjan Chowdhury · 2023 · arXiv:2304.07318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gate-controlled proximity effect in superconductor/ferromagnet van der Waals heterostructures
similarity 0.89G. A. Bobkov et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2405.07575
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust parity-mixed superconductivity in disordered monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides
similarity 0.88David Möckli & Maxim Khodas · 2018 · arXiv:1807.05814
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three-dimensional electron-hole superfluidity in a superlattice close to room temperature
similarity 0.88M. Van der Donck et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.01123
Source status unknown — claims are unverified