Theory of ballistic SNS junctions revisited
Edouard Sonin
arXiv:2511.02967 · 2026-07-28 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recently suggested theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions demonstrated that in junctions without normal scattering (the case of equal Fermi velocities and effective masses in all layers) phase gradients in superconducting leads cannot be ignored. The revision of the previous theory ignoring them essentially changes the current-phase relation (CPR) of short junctions at $T=0$. It transforms it from forward-skewed to backward-skewed. The CPR at temperatures exceeding the energy spacing between Andreev levels but less than the critical temperature was also calculated. The current at these temperatures is temperature independent and decreases with growing $L$ as $1/L^4$. The previous theory predicted the current exponentially decreasing with growing $T$ and $L$. The SNS junctions with normal scattering (non-equal Fermi velocities in leads and inside the junction) were also analyzed. At strong mismatch of Fermi velocities the planar ballistic SNS junction becomes a common Josephson junction, which is a weak link and satisfies the Ambegaokar--Baratoff relation. Implications of the analysis for non-planar junctions (narrow normal bridge between two bulk superconductors) are also discussed. A qualitative explanation of experimental observation of backward-skewed CPR in short InAs nanowire bridge junctions was suggested.
Similar papers
Andreev spin qubits in multichannel Rashba nanowires
similarity 0.88Sunghun Park & A. Levy Yeyati · 2017 · arXiv:1707.04273
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev crystals in hybrid Josephson junction arrays
similarity 0.88Anders Enevold Dahl et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2508.11768
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-dependent Andreev bound states of a quantum dot coupled to two superconducting leads
similarity 0.88R. Taranko et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1812.02153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection, Andreev states, and long ballistic SNS junction
similarity 0.88Edouard Sonin · 2024 · arXiv:2404.16593
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev versus Tunneling Spectroscopy of Unconventional Flat Band Superconductors
similarity 0.88Sayak Biswas et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.07744
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Andreev Rectification
similarity 0.88Pok Man Tam et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.14050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified