← Back to search

Impact of Electron Correlations on Infinite-Layer Cuprates and Nickelates

Xunyang Hong, Yuetong Wu, Ying Chan, Sze Tung Li, I. Biało, L. Martinelli, A. Drewanowski, Qiang Gao, Xiaolin Ren, Xingjiang Zhou, Zhihai Zhu, A. Galdi, D. G. Schlom, K. M. Shen, J. Choi, M. Garcia Fernandez, Ke-Jin Zhou, N. B. Brookes, H. M. Rønnow, Qisi Wang, J. Chang

arXiv:2511.09460 · DOI 10.1038/s43246-026-01175-0 · 2025-11-12 · Communications Materials

T1experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Optimization of unconventional superconductivity involves a balance of interaction strengths. Precise determination of correlation strength across different material families is therefore important. Here, we present a combined X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) study of infinite-layer PrNiO$_2$ and SrCuO$_2$ that enables fair comparison of their interaction strengths. For both compounds, we study the orbital and magnetic excitations and extract their dispersions along high-symmetry directions. Using a single-band Hubbard model and including higher-order exchange interactions, we derive the correlation factor $U/t$ for both compounds. A key finding is that despite a smaller Coulomb repulsion $U$, PrNiO$_2$ exhibits a correlation strength that is 20% stronger than that of its isostructural cuprate counterpart SrCuO$_2$. This indicates that a moderation of the correlation strength may further optimize superconductivity in nickelates.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Pr0.82Sr0.18NiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

17Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.82Sr0.18NiO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers