Integration and Resource Estimation of Cryoelectronics for Superconducting Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers
Shiro Kawabata
arXiv:2601.03922 · 2026-01-07
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scaling superconducting quantum computers to the fault-tolerant regime calls for a commensurate scaling of the classical control and readout stack. Today's systems largely rely on room-temperature, rack-based instrumentation connected to dilution-refrigerator cryostats through many coaxial cables. Looking ahead, superconducting fault-tolerant quantum computers (FTQCs) will likely adopt a heterogeneous quantum-classical architecture that places selected electronics at cryogenic stages -- for example, cryo-CMOS at 4~K and superconducting digital logic at 4~K and/or mK stages -- to curb wiring and thermal-load overheads. This review distills key requirements, surveys representative room-temperature and cryogenic approaches, and provides a transparent first-order accounting framework for cryoelectronics. Using an RSA-2048-scale benchmark as a concrete reference point, we illustrate how scaling targets motivate constraints on multiplexing and stage-wise cryogenic power, and discuss implications for functional partitioning across room-temperature electronics, cryo-CMOS, and superconducting logic.
Similar papers
Interfacing Superconductor and Semiconductor Digital Electronics
similarity 0.89Yerzhan Mustafa & Selçuk Köse · 2026 · arXiv:2601.09969
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluxon readout of a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.88Kirill G. Fedorov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.0645
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scalable Asynchronous Single Flux Quantum Up-Down Counter using Josephson Trapping Lines and α-Cells
similarity 0.87Mustafa Altay Karamuftuoglu et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2505.04069
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor bistable vortex memory for data storage and in-memory computing
similarity 0.87Mustafa Altay Karamuftuoglu et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2406.08871
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital coherent control of a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.86Edward Leonard et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1806.07930
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling and Suppressing Unwanted Parasitic Interactions in Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.86Xuexin Xu · 2024 · arXiv:2407.08318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified