Noise tailoring for error mitigation and for diagnozing digital quantum computers
Thibault Scoquart, Hugo Perrin, Kyrylo Snizhko
arXiv:2601.04830 · 2026-01-08
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Error mitigation (EM) methods are crucial for obtaining reliable results in the realm of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers, where noise significantly impacts output accuracy. Some EM protocols are particularly efficient for specific types of noise. Yet the noise in the actual hardware may not align with that. In this article, we introduce Noise Tailoring (NT) -- an innovative strategy designed to modify the structure of the noise associated with two-qubit gates through statistical sampling. We perform classical emulation of the protocol behavior and find that the NT+EM results can be up to 5 times more accurate than the results of EM alone for realistic Pauli noise acting on two-qubit gates. At the same time, on actual IBM quantum computers, the NT method falls victim to various small error sources beyond Markovian Pauli noise. We propose to use the NT method for characterizing such error sources on quantum computers in order to inform hardware development.
Similar papers
Mitigating crosstalk errors by randomized compiling: Simulation of the BCS model on a superconducting quantum computer
similarity 0.84Hugo Perrin et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2305.02345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fragility of gate-error metrics in simulation models of flux-tunable transmon quantum computers
similarity 0.83H. Lagemann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Broadband noise decoherence in solid-state complex architectures
similarity 0.83Paladino, E et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.4736
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Readout error mitigated quantum state tomography tested on superconducting qubits
similarity 0.83Adrian Skasberg Aasen et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.04211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Roadmap to fault tolerant quantum computation using topological qubit arrays
similarity 0.82David Aasen et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2502.12252
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Digital-analog quantum computing of fermion-boson models in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.82Shubham Kumar et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.12040
Source status unknown — claims are unverified