From perovskite to infinite-layer nickelates: hole concentration from x-ray absorption
R. Pons, M. Flavenot, K. Fürsich, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, M. R. Cantarino, E. Goering, P. Nagel, S. Schuppler, G. Kim, G. Logvenov, B. Keimer, R. J. Green, D. Preziosi, E. Benckiser
arXiv:2601.07710 · 2026-01-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The difficulty of determining cation concentrations and oxygen stoichiometry in infinite-layer nickelate thin films has so far prevented clear experimental identification of the nickel electron configuration in the superconducting phase. We used soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy to study the successive changes in PrNiO$_x$ thin films at various intermediate stages of topotactic reduction with $x=2-3$. By comparing the Ni-$L$ edge spectra to single and double cluster ligand-field calculations, we find that none of our samples exhibit a pure $d^9$ configuration. Our quantitative analysis using the charge sum rule shows that even when films are maximally reduced, the averaged number of nickel $3d$ holes is 1.35. Superconducting samples have even higher values, calling into question the previously assumed limit of hole doping. Concomitant changes in the oxygen $K$-edge absorption spectra upon reduction indicate the presence of oxygen $2p$ holes, even in the most reduced films. Overall, our results suggest a complex interplay of hole doping mechanisms resulting from self-doping effects and oxygen non-stoichiometry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1-yCayCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Phase formation in hole- and electron-doped rare-earth nickelate single crystals
similarity 0.88P. Puphal et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.04157
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proposed ordering of textured spin singlets in a bulk infinite layer nickelate
similarity 0.88Hyo-Sun Jin et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.03185
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates: a review of recent progress, focusing on thin films
similarity 0.87Yang Zhang et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.18385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical properties and electronic correlations in LaNiO bilayer nickelates under high pressure
similarity 0.87Benjamin Geisler et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2401.04258
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron vs. hole doping in infinite-layer nickelates: electronic structure, magnetism and correlations
similarity 0.87Ezra Day-Roberts et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2606.00223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Floating zone growth at high oxygen pressures in Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer nickelate YSrNiAlO
similarity 0.87H. Yilmaz et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.07861
Source status unknown — claims are unverified