Quantitative imaging of Abrikosov vortices by scanning quantum magnetometry
Clemens Schäfermeier, Ankit Sharma, Christopher Kelvin von Grundherr, Dieter Andres, Andrea Morales, Jan Rhensius, Gabriel Puebla-Hellmann, Mirko Bacani
arXiv:2602.13060 · 2026-02-13
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Understanding vortex matter in type-II superconductors is central to controlling dissipation and flux pinning in superconducting materials and devices. Here, we use cryogenic scanning nitrogen vacancy magnetometry (NVM) to image Abrikosov vortices in the cuprate superconductors BSCCO-2212 and YBCO under controlled field-cooled conditions. Measurements, which are performed using continuous-wave optically detected magnetic resonance (cw-ODMR) in a closed-cycle cryostat, yield quantitative magnetic-field maps with nanoscale spatial resolution. In BSCCO-2212 at 71 K, we resolve a well-ordered triangular vortex lattice, whose symmetry and spacing are confirmed through 2D Fourier analysis and are consistent with flux quantization. YBCO thin films imaged at 3 K exhibit a more disordered vortex arrangement reflecting stronger pinning, while maintaining quantitative agreement between measured vortex density and the applied magnetic field. These results render our cryogenic scanning NVM a reliable quantitative tool for real-space studies of vortices in high-$T_c$ superconductors, in particular since such a remarkable magnetic resolution has been achieved within relatively short acquisition times of 2 to 4 h.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Probing confined vortices with a superconducting nanobridge
similarity 0.92Marek Foltyn et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2306.01555
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Case studies on time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations for superconducting applications
similarity 0.89Cun Xue et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2403.03729
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging Flux Vortices in MgB2 using Transmission Electron Microscopy
similarity 0.89J. C. Loudon et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.1969
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging and controlling vortex dynamics in mesoscopic superconductor-normal-metal-superconductor arrays
similarity 0.89Tyler Naibert et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.08956
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging and controlling vortex dynamics in mesoscopic superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor arrays
similarity 0.89Tyler R. Naibert et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron-beam-induced shift in the apparent position of a pinned vortex in a thin superconducting film
similarity 0.89John R. Clem · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified