Quantum Reservoir Computing for Statistical Classification in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit
J. J. Prieto-Garcia, A. G. del Pozo-Martín, M. Pino
arXiv:2602.15474 · 2026-02-17
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze numerically the performance of Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) for statistical and financial problems. We use a reservoir composed of two superconducting islands coupled via their charge degrees of freedom. The key non-linear elements that provide the reservoir with rich and complex dynamics are the Josephson junctions that connect each island to the ground. We show that QRC implemented in this circuit can accurately classify complex probability distributions, including those with heavy tails, and identify regimes in correlated time series, such as periods of high volatility generated by standard econometric models. We find QRC to outperform some of the best classical methods when the amount of information is limited. This demonstrates its potential to be a noise-resilient quantum learning approach capable of tackling real-world problems within currently available superconducting platforms. We further discuss how to improve our QRC algorithm in real superconducting hardware to benefit from a much larger Hilbert space.
Similar papers
Parametric four-wave mixing toolbox for superconducting resonators
similarity 0.89A. V. Sharypov et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.5450
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rapid state purification protocols for a Cooper pair box
similarity 0.88E. J. Griffith et al. · 2006 · arXiv:quant-ph/0610044
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High fidelity universal set of quantum gates using non-adiabatic rapid passage
similarity 0.88R. Li et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0802.3543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive reservoir influence on the superconducting phase qubit
similarity 0.88A. H. Homid et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.06714
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Physics of the Majorana-superconducting qubit hybrids
similarity 0.88D. B. Karki et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2309.08758
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent superconducting quantum pump
similarity 0.88F. Hoehne et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.5543
Source status unknown — claims are unverified